IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] WG adoption of draft-stenberg-homenet-hncp-00

Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net> Wed, 26 March 2014 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <v6ops@globis.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C9A1A03CB for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7bblYPRFujvc for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from globis01.globis.net (RayH-1-pt.tunnel.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f14:62e::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8821A03C6 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577CB870073; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:57:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from globis01.globis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.globis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yLAN6J5UQWHt; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:57:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Rays-iMac.local (unknown [192.168.0.3]) (Authenticated sender: Ray.Hunter@globis.net) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2FD6C87005E; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:57:55 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <53333F51.5030106@globis.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:57:53 +0100
From: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.9 (Macintosh/20140129)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
References: <4943103B-77FB-4F95-A519-4FDE1246A128@nominet.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4943103B-77FB-4F95-A519-4FDE1246A128@nominet.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/ZU7MFPrVl5hfmnoIE9TZ8DWpWwc
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] WG adoption of draft-stenberg-homenet-hncp-00
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:57:58 -0000

Support adoption of HNCP as a WG item.

I am interested to read more information on how Homenet would/could work 
with zero routing protocol.

I presumed exactly one common Homenet interworking routing protocol.

Ray Bellis wrote:
> At IETF 89 in London we took three hums:
>
> 1. On use of OSPF vs HNCP for configuration - strong consensus for HNCP
>
> 2. On how many routing protocols we should support in Homenet -
>    strong consensus that it should be zero or one, but no consensus yet
>    on which.
>
> 3. On adoption of HNCP as a WG item - good consensus for, a few undecided,
>    none against.
>
> On this basis the Chairs wish to proceed with the formal call for adoption of draft-stenberg-homenet-hncp-00, with a two week response window.
>
> Please therefore send your comments on adoption of this draft to the list before 23:59 UTC on Tuesday 1st April.
>
> thanks,
>
> Ray and Mark
>

-- 
Regards,
RayH

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email