Re: [homenet] supporting homenet in CE routers
james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> Thu, 16 November 2017 19:45 UTC
Return-Path: <jhw@google.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A52A124205 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:45:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V9jdJikL6FpZ for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:45:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE2431201F2 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:45:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 4so121568pge.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:45:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=tZsx0iDL2sJRcUDuueyuzhHUel4Ge50ptTBbJUnXglg=; b=fR4OoQaTYBAiFwMvmnA9O6iMx5/GsPZSPtE88lyvNTdxtqJG9kZDwZLL9k9XkbJGCA i6ZAmGjNpq6+tk2ey2p+p4qm3BxpL5w1Mngm53L1s4q8u+S+l6MhvAMuPVZWOUk9OVuN k2bg1M/iyEdZ62L06ddhFwUZa2wYeX2lnlgIeqg2oy+QiEVyNBqnxkPlgtghmcp+4P+C FFovqiO5hIdrBFCdAlir6ZyyQ+LbK4TICMRP/BEFigrlrGv4oqbY9ooBU+wVsOfLknKq Ini4cVmcx40uLx4hDRR4y5n/DhRaaVz+cAhLowIoTd+tX+1yz2+trjZ+fWbqCPh9Ph/2 L9Lg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=tZsx0iDL2sJRcUDuueyuzhHUel4Ge50ptTBbJUnXglg=; b=jjYkbiYsUGcdHdxR4cWhfFj+4arhZJfeg2wT+9qa3Z54/U+fne853KZBbKNWtYbA4b 1fV+lmjGF6xpbpRP2TEwsHPLirWdbhhSmM4ctf/8druhvh8BgXanTeDlmAZv78Wrzw4d x06pIppfJNrIXmZthCfYy3DGD/zmIsza9sJFocoEb7HlNaqS7QcAD+emLyKGF6G3Zn1y 6PySAU81J8PuHyVnfNNIpqtAhHxyXJ4XNgpf4uhtzSpwWk/L5Q2swEDJeVMfeuX7yZx/ +1xh7bLmpKLqhpfTy60vEZvRPYwELd09i5raGAXoaqm4o0OhO0mPjCjz1a4bcfQOMnpS QXyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5CRlfSxDQiGQT82A42ioifMLrQzKSu3wnDWKCYFZEGTX7E+lbC IR6tf7LgyfCh1LLNXn/zXQYvlZ00h6k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZCGXV2G894U8j4owc9hvsi57k1Gsu6bvV/CweNYXnpGYNcDr77GnB+4Dmg5A/2CCOnqUKsUQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.155.25 with SMTP id r25mr2599169pgd.397.1510861544870; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620::10e7:10:a5ca:6de1:c280:7c3f? ([2620:0:10e7:10:a5ca:6de1:c280:7c3f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 69sm3926766pfj.28.2017.11.16.11.45.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:45:44 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Message-Id: <D0D251A6-84A2-4A45-AEE3-401F204DAEF0@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2622F96C-FB74-44F8-A1E1-1DC90108A928"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:45:43 -0800
In-Reply-To: <30DB1ABA-97E5-4EC0-8D3F-635F30E774FE@consulintel.es>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
References: <30DB1ABA-97E5-4EC0-8D3F-635F30E774FE@consulintel.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/izknklqhcV-modrswj-TLVVi-sc>
Subject: Re: [homenet] supporting homenet in CE routers
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:45:47 -0000
On Nov 15, 2017, at 20:59, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote: > > As requested in the meeting, here is the question to the WG. > Do we believe that homenet WG should work in a document to specify how and what IPv6 CE routers should support for a correct homenet support? My answer to this question has not changed. I believe the WG should not try to write any specification applicable to IPv6 CE routers. Instead I strongly believe the resources of the working group are best spent on specifying the behavior of HOMENET domain interior routers, recognizing the ways existing IPv6 CE routers behave, and the documenting the considerations entailed by their behavior for the benefit of developers of interior routers. I do not believe that HOMENET is in any position to specify how IPv6 CE routers are to behave. --james woodyatt <jhw@google.com <mailto:jhw@google.com>>
- [homenet] supporting homenet in CE routers JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [homenet] supporting homenet in CE routers james woodyatt
- Re: [homenet] supporting homenet in CE routers Teco Boot