Re: [homenet] Name service design principles: a proposal

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Fri, 29 June 2012 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140EF21F8808 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SR6K4mLfVqpw for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB3121F8687 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from relay17.apple.com ([17.128.113.18]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0M6E00B8QA4BVAC2@mail-out.apple.com> for homenet@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807112-b7f826d000004103-00-4fee08cc683a
Received: from kallisti.apple.com (kallisti.apple.com [17.193.13.64]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay17.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 22.BE.16643.CC80EEF4; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <4FEDF39D.8060909@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:58:03 -0700
Message-id: <A6DF3E8C-1E3B-4C0F-8EDB-292466631C02@apple.com>
References: <4FEDC46C.8070205@ogud.com> <07C6F7FE-8115-4B8E-867B-B92EB9932154@gmail.com> <4FEDF39D.8060909@mtcc.com>
To: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1482)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuplluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRPMjroHuG452/wY1GAYv3iw6xODB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEr49CBncwFk1gr3nT+YmtgnMLSxcjBISFgItH216SLkRPIFJO4 cG89WxcjF4eQwGwmid3/TzODJJgFtCRu/HvJBGLzCuhJ3Nt+A8wWFnCU2PLmGxuIzSagIvHt 8l2wOKeAhsTOKb1gcRYBVYmt22axQ8zRlli28DUzxBwbicenn7KC2EICJRJv9s5gBLFFBPQl nh75xQZxkKzE7+3LWSYw8s1CcsYsJGfMQjJ2ASPzKkbBotScxEpDc73EgoKcVL3k/NxNjKBA aigU2sF4f5feIUYBDkYlHt5NV9/6C7EmlhVX5h5ilOBgVhLhfbgYKMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNa fIhRmoNFSZz3f8VrfyGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpgsEwenVAOj0TEtofXqsn+K/fflCAS9bD67NGHD mmBPsfirQhzyh/LmLBW/9aJicgjbmler2c7cLphvEZLxZPXGexImIiyvHAuTpt0IU65erGza 2pb9c6UJj8q5GbkbhHiLhJXmffz8NfNoiKH3BQUeFv2UAMmQOzKc8v8Tq2czVVZln7pxM+3i dX3lpGglluKMREMt5qLiRACkMtwjIAIAAA==
Subject: Re: [homenet] Name service design principles: a proposal
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:58:30 -0000

On Jun 29, 2012, at 11:27 , Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:
> 
> Maybe I can add some fuel to Olafur's fire. I'd like to say that the homenet name service MUST be DNS.

Let's go further.  Let's say that it must be DNS-Based Service Discovery [I-D.cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd], which has been in the RFC Editor Queue for 199 days at this point, so one imagines that it stands a decent chance of being a published RFC by the time HOMENET finishes its first round of major work.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, core os networking

[*] <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd/>