IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hrpc] Working group last call for draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Thu, 01 July 2021 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC513A1527 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.228
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.338, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3JOL5QRIxIrZ for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA82A3A1418 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 1 Jul 2021 11:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:aa15:4101:2a80:ec7b:db74:3c3f:7c6] ([IPv6:2a02:aa15:4101:2a80:ec7b:db74:3c3f:7c6]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 161IMuhi009730 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Jul 2021 20:22:56 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1625163777; bh=6hHnE2DJAYiqla5IGdW1WFI7TfwTXlS3CS2YRUq6JIo=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lQ2AWYrJ5XpPqrHo4rrkghW2gAHyWJNXgi5cbu9JF7xeWGOC9riu92QMp1ZHu8ZmC EdOOPUbwiHXJP90W6QHewPGQd3CNk4+NDzeMRiHanHT7Mw6OfV866Ce4wtgoHsjvom sGtVyTeYXFKfUw7IOnMjz+rd9shyaI+w6ECGLnsI=
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>
Cc: Mallory Knodel <mallory@cdt.org>, "hrpc@irtf.org" <hrpc@irtf.org>, Gurshabad Grover <gurshabad@cis-india.org>
References: <447c4444-800b-dfb9-de3e-bbbe3bb4ac64@lear.ch> <6b540117-38a6-fbfa-3749-048d14b34f38@cis-india.org> <CAGVFjMK5K_VQWiQCre7r21c+ofasyUshP5wFYSxmjtX5147Q6Q@mail.gmail.com> <20210701165934.GA24015@nic.fr> <a6c3d183-1b36-61f5-5409-a11b9d49a29e@lear.ch> <9bd076e9-3880-9b2d-b836-4ef56c85cabe@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Message-ID: <de56584f-e2b0-0b08-230c-c5335e8cfc43@lear.ch>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 20:22:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9bd076e9-3880-9b2d-b836-4ef56c85cabe@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VA2fc0RmTSF04zau6wym0q0dv5mtr2ZY9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/2NazuZgiBTt-z-7t-LhmwZEAd8E>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] Working group last call for draft-irtf-hrpc-guidelines
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 18:23:37 -0000

On 01.07.21 20:19, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 01/07/2021 18:29, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> Surely there is a tussle between This end device, the user and his or 
>> her rights, and OTHER end devices and their users and their rights.
>
> I don't think that's "sure."

Surely there is.  But it's not the only tussle.  There are also 
governments acting outside their citizens' interests.  I'm a little 
surprised you didn't go for that one first ;-)

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email