IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-political - current determination regarding RG last call.

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 15 October 2019 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF2B120119 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sQneU5OdApTv for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD291120043 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1605; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1571148716; x=1572358316; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=yshnigK/gduRLlrnGFrV3CP/r1qdQQxSsaz1KeWmoec=; b=FGdWrwtEXKAy7QZphCrQ0IYqhWsRZNkRLn0OQ49sikz5Da+xObMIGh+v Z2lORFb6N/qpMxWRRdpVs8SIA5+l5KQex1hS9DDoKQvBRTQXWWppoMHfU 1BKV+sNBiXqD0F8a46zZMYnQxwKCwZ55vGo2v+ICJPUbmZ7MdshN3KNPc g=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AHAAAP06Vd/xbLJq1mGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBgWcEAQEBAQELAYFugXABIBKMcWCHSSWZLIF7AgcBAQEJAwEBLwEBhEACgxI0CQ4CAwkBAQQBAQECAQUEbYU5hUwBBAFoEQULCw44VwaDNQGCVyCuT4InhU2EaRCBNAGBUopTgX+BOAwTgkw+iASCLASWK5cfgiyCMYETkVcbgiqXF4Q6oB6DFAIEBgUCFYFSOYFYMxoIGxVlAYJCPRIQFIIHjhA/A5F5AQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,300,1566864000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="17965085"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 15 Oct 2019 14:11:52 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp6299.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp6299.cisco.com [10.61.88.154]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9FEBpWa017444 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:11:52 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <2E9B4A48-CFD4-4797-946D-07E3CEE51D43@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B34C4E5E-3D69-49BE-8C61-809955CB7656"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:11:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBONvpKT35BVS5JQTrOFRSOjWStya1MKcOjemB8tc6UeXA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: avri@doria.org, hrpc@irtf.org
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
References: <53caa46d-7ea5-f73f-1476-83d8d25555ba@doria.org> <2AE7E345-43BE-436C-BED9-3E39A7909B47@cisco.com> <CABcZeBONvpKT35BVS5JQTrOFRSOjWStya1MKcOjemB8tc6UeXA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.88.154, ams3-vpn-dhcp6299.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/dkGfqrKvx6d4DKb_f1pDNqy3RIo>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-political - current determination regarding RG last call.
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "mail@nielstenoever.net" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:11:59 -0000

Hi Eric

> I would want there to be some level of consensus that the we had confidence in the statements in the document (just as I would want if I were to be on the PC of a conference which was considering this as a submission).


Yes.  My point is simply that it is possible for two or more papers to be well written that rely on different data sets or different assumptions to derive different analysis and reach differing conclusions, and so long as I am not being asked to endorse one over the other, and so long as I have learned something interesting, then I would want the work to be published.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email