IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-political - current determination regarding RG last call.

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 15 October 2019 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128F612010F for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jcf3kSav_ceV for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03A5312010E for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id y23so20861469lje.9 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/X9ZgfeoXdmMWJTuoCbuMzWsRyFcZn4+lApAdDPfts0=; b=LqMyC6bj++5X3VX76cML+anwcD3TdIMN0t31Ux4vcF/MgDMxhTBbAkbIog1AbLWLfs ieXlKLZjVTnjjEhKReikCW3ZoJsjQy1lo2t8uboyNt1W2HrVDuuY81flJqvBkNL/1Itf aNgYxo+1vXGEWrLpqjXSfzUokSwoggk+ZhrOAW85oC+dT6kjQLkTDLUMDjX8BGvLo16F fFxVNLNoMc0OIF+A+wKZgEo23G1s094uCfAzXgojOmOaL8kwkrlSybluqsgAJplsHqYc GaEHrFkBlylYkXQT+b6y/adrzGqJJAKpa3x38dVOfMWa5XtIb/7xL01Rp+oZMC9QKIK3 Brcw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/X9ZgfeoXdmMWJTuoCbuMzWsRyFcZn4+lApAdDPfts0=; b=rqCclw0PUzHRV1h7v6O06qyt7lEi6jQm3TQoZ5S+qDhgdZ1d9t/+EF/HEejKjKGnnL ntSolT2m8nHQ2tlEJIab+kjobqaLcyP+JotKMz8EyMN2lRgK7XFRFW5DhSPHte6naIMw /xrrwh9+CRl0gpbAX7sHbmp38eM5bzvkHDBMo8ZiQqrLl+EYd21yzKfn7Af2QH9KGlI1 JNn9VRTTPmMFe2xgj6IvaIZ1TXBbKCY6RWEHYWo9yOMGP1XGcjxhm/6wasvKLNGChY1t e8pJYzkH/p71yVKDtUaHJL7NUXqhO2Jo3qKiH+w0uYaAgbVjgLPm2FsDlfmzkmIiEOva +j/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXFPrB0umU58wZDFCINGJD/yXCyPWrVSTuUc1gdd/26e2kKl2Ks kAg9xzXSI+geIgxnmGn/EPPJyljmmQhpCBTA2ZVkPg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw9rpIts+COBwjYJ1QUxA1Zws8xdr0JpwvCSYGNcN/xwZhxVMO5l6vu/STIU0BGOUS37vHT/Kn+jsqrs0A6Y1c=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:420a:: with SMTP id p10mr12422845lja.16.1571156305258; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <53caa46d-7ea5-f73f-1476-83d8d25555ba@doria.org> <2AE7E345-43BE-436C-BED9-3E39A7909B47@cisco.com> <CABcZeBONvpKT35BVS5JQTrOFRSOjWStya1MKcOjemB8tc6UeXA@mail.gmail.com> <2E9B4A48-CFD4-4797-946D-07E3CEE51D43@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <2E9B4A48-CFD4-4797-946D-07E3CEE51D43@cisco.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:17:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPpghbc0DA_2bf9ssALrBRhHujkZUFvDaXqpJNSJ3VbrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: avri@doria.org, hrpc@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000763fcb0594f5551e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/vQiqt9WP038guuQ1Gx9yZrhu01E>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] draft-irtf-hrpc-political - current determination regarding RG last call.
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "mail@nielstenoever.net" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:18:29 -0000

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:11 AM Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi Eric
>
> > I would want there to be some level of consensus that the we had
> confidence in the statements in the document (just as I would want if I
> were to be on the PC of a conference which was considering this as a
> submission).
>
>
> Yes.  My point is simply that it is possible for two or more papers to be
> well written that rely on different data sets or different assumptions to
> derive different analysis and reach differing conclusions, and so long as I
> am not being asked to endorse one over the other, and so long as I have
> learned something interesting, then I would want the work to be published.
>

Yes, I agree with this. However, I do not think that this document as
currently written is anywhere near strong enough to serve that purpose.

-Ekr


> Eliot
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email