IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] Ticket 6: host-only cookies

Bil Corry <bil@corry.biz> Wed, 03 February 2010 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <bil@corry.biz>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E1428C252 for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:01:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.224
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cGENYEez0vsR for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:01:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.mindio.com (app1.bc.anu.net [193.189.141.126]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A6328C265 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:47:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-69-181-67-65.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [69.181.67.65]) by mail.mindio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408E4FCFCC; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:47:56 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <4B69C4C5.2060403@corry.biz>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:47:33 -0800
From: Bil Corry <bil@corry.biz>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
References: <7789133a1001220050m56cc438x35099b7972639331@mail.gmail.com> <4B59B834.3030500@gmail.com> <4C374A2653EB5E43AF886CE70DFC567213CE9BE2B4@34093-MBX-C03.mex07a.mlsrvr.com> <7789133a1002012300k4627d9a2sad7f5b776c544487@mail.gmail.com> <4B683AE4.3080606@corry.biz> <7789133a1002020737i47869b98m76844aacb225d1ed@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7789133a1002020737i47869b98m76844aacb225d1ed@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: http-state <http-state@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-state] Ticket 6: host-only cookies
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:01:35 -0000

Adam Barth wrote on 2/2/2010 7:37 AM: 
> I'm not sure I understand your question.  Can you phrase it more
> operationally (in terms of who sends which messages to whom)?

Nevermind, not sure what I was thinking.  Obviously not enough sleep yesterday.


- Bil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email