Re: [http-state] BNF notation differences, was: Comments on draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-08.txt (1 - 4.1.2.)

Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com> Wed, 14 July 2010 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@adambarth.com>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91823A680D for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.345, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fHvOmYuQ-gOv for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414573A6A36 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so1274082eyb.31 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.31.129 with SMTP id y1mr13000266ebc.42.1279127828570; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x54sm58859676eeh.11.2010.07.14.10.17.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so7602362iwn.31 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.35.199 with SMTP id q7mr17695299ibd.47.1279127824108; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.143.145 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <hchr365sh9132rbgacd7750mjn17th5rh8@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <f5jqv5pu3oksmjndegd5a329gp40opqsr5@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <AANLkTin2dZ3v681D2W4yZEHhnc_0G8mAQRsMA8ZQ6wWF@mail.gmail.com> <g13rv59fpsefi1jhuuuds4evqqc8baia7o@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <AANLkTimUXR0FI3D3KKZ2rOO2QEEGReKlRBCY5ZanwL24@mail.gmail.com> <lbb706tqebunfropg9o1teehms9fu5aq53@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <AANLkTinmliI2Sp0hU0m0IqzWpEpACeNLbW_Q_KeQnJ-O@mail.gmail.com> <4C3DC535.4020205@gmx.de> <hchr365sh9132rbgacd7750mjn17th5rh8@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
From: Adam Barth <ietf@adambarth.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:16:43 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTin6pEREhPvFy18qnNiZ8iG221NDOrkkVP0uXeeU@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: http-state@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [http-state] BNF notation differences, was: Comments on draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-08.txt (1 - 4.1.2.)
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:17:04 -0000

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:
> * Julian Reschke wrote:
>>So the comment was applied to sane-cookie-date, but it also applies to
>>token. Furthermore, the ABNF for domain-value (RFC 1034) uses yet
>>another syntax. So maybe it would be better to remove the comment again,
>>and just to add a prose warning that these three productions inherited
>>from other specs are defined in different variants of ABNF.
>
> The reference to RFC 1034 is most likely in error, the subdomain rule
> there prohibits for instance values that start with a digit; see e.g.
> draft-iab-idn-encoding for some of the history around that.

Is there another reference you'd prefer?

Adam