Re: [http-state] BNF notation differences, was: Comments on draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-08.txt (1 - 4.1.2.)

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Wed, 14 July 2010 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D4B3A6B45 for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id plsfQkTKgV1j for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D95263A6809 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2010 14:19:12 -0000
Received: from dslb-094-223-187-140.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO hive) [94.223.187.140] by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 14 Jul 2010 16:19:12 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/8itdUv578RhJfAyhSYbxc+80uAkXnT7GwzgNvrl pciNyrcWMLFBln
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:19:10 +0200
Message-ID: <hchr365sh9132rbgacd7750mjn17th5rh8@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <f5jqv5pu3oksmjndegd5a329gp40opqsr5@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <AANLkTin2dZ3v681D2W4yZEHhnc_0G8mAQRsMA8ZQ6wWF@mail.gmail.com> <g13rv59fpsefi1jhuuuds4evqqc8baia7o@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <AANLkTimUXR0FI3D3KKZ2rOO2QEEGReKlRBCY5ZanwL24@mail.gmail.com> <lbb706tqebunfropg9o1teehms9fu5aq53@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <AANLkTinmliI2Sp0hU0m0IqzWpEpACeNLbW_Q_KeQnJ-O@mail.gmail.com> <4C3DC535.4020205@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C3DC535.4020205@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: http-state@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [http-state] BNF notation differences, was: Comments on draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-08.txt (1 - 4.1.2.)
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:19:08 -0000

* Julian Reschke wrote:
>So the comment was applied to sane-cookie-date, but it also applies to 
>token. Furthermore, the ABNF for domain-value (RFC 1034) uses yet 
>another syntax. So maybe it would be better to remove the comment again, 
>and just to add a prose warning that these three productions inherited 
>from other specs are defined in different variants of ABNF.

The reference to RFC 1034 is most likely in error, the subdomain rule
there prohibits for instance values that start with a digit; see e.g.
draft-iab-idn-encoding for some of the history around that. 
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/