IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [httpapi] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 15 February 2023 05:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D56C187983; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:08:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b="S2s510GI"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="imPX7BmQ"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XAM7G64t8wKU; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:08:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A50FC169505; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:08:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE835C0107; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:08:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:08:27 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1676437707; x= 1676524107; bh=480jvcsgddd1oANb3i1zK8b6TJaqVuigs3m2DnL3kgI=; b=S 2s510GIi2s0SedXqqMvFECkoHsM5KM0Zua4XFXKxBDwFHnFOHDis7M1OngaAyk3P 9ZnueFzSlWYNgXNUIP3Uelm2jLU5qUKA8j/NmkcCHD7EDWUf/7lqZwbVVcewGMQe 8Jxbf3hDTu1N6zxiH+38X9Co48WempWHLEfy6892zUA6W2HDX6CZWGpimck1/vHB ePnZd/IXTuVdIUmL2aXPc1h2ljYSq+2n55lVAQzCGtwkzn4IgbuLsNhKgmMBs3M8 ENJ69BHFrcbXPxfI3kvWfyBNyKMLDDsR6XaexEvOuTThHrpV43LdXuZ+M5U5NvqA ReJITak26MZJvn5/efTtg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1676437707; x= 1676524107; bh=480jvcsgddd1oANb3i1zK8b6TJaqVuigs3m2DnL3kgI=; b=i mPX7BmQYgcVYq5RG7Prq8OM2GfZz4w6lxTfcU8HUrciFnalGAu+ALAjldQzeJCJ8 ZEcsq+SB89rf7aEN9iOrMd0QnqDBdlzdgXsyxsiU6JRTZCftEORD14ZCpexXd7Q+ ODpHLNIYdIvl1J5rRv3bvAadjAIhk8xDeoLSrLJX5iA6I4lXOptGCqVSa+pH9ZHx rNWyNXs9SvOLa9C+3SGbopzYONMQ46PK6N6MFl+9ZaC3mYYIlHt1r5DlobM7+D34 /nf5EtFS0ywVxiYzOMVjYzGv9D06e0IZqkWASa5pYad2tCJVe8LbyKmWMzD6S+2t SOk/xsUVH0FnHvnlt76NA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:y2jsY8C0jLZscHk4ZyU-3eKLZk9BCVGbZ2thTesfTOnAWfgOLL76KA> <xme:y2jsY-iRQ40sYaFEVEGY1GJv8T-EgmCehp_o4WIejx1QFPjl4uQyIVCZ8ELIP3Ib3 qiXKpOBcEh7OEsfPA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:y2jsY_nnG4QgBp0ipy3IOdKczr-k-S4GKebAN84eY8XlbsZa1IOlupUMHis7h9WEqu8>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudeigedgjeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghr khcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnheptddtgefgueevtddugfdtkeffudegveetffegjeelhfdvtedvueejteegueeg teetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:y2jsYyznul5d1VMQZD8gNRgTONpu_lBA3oxjbwchPbaIaXt-xCvaIQ> <xmx:y2jsYxS6GcIxvLZrdDc6Z0Sz1Ye8wHmgVZhf2v_MtqRORMHg8tIxAw> <xmx:y2jsY9bOeCVKaoUYh9L8mAsuL4NO3ZElGDO26GeQmr29W6-duK1zQg> <xmx:y2jsY6Jw0Sh5KWz_0Ygx2osWadQEplDEhQ4AheZqq18Na8rG20IbpQ>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:08:26 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <0119F2EA-3353-46D9-9496-B115B9655A92@eggert.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:08:05 -0800
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, HTTP APIs Working Group <httpapi@ietf.org>, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net>, Sanjay Dalal <sanjay.dalal@cal.berkeley.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5F1069BD-3BF8-4D5D-82CB-0AA40EC646F5@mnot.net>
References: <166690880800.46780.14432111778502052910@ietfa.amsl.com> <0119F2EA-3353-46D9-9496-B115B9655A92@eggert.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/5UoTS2NO-1Jo6FLlJCQwZO-wq9c>
Subject: Re: [httpapi] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-04
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:08:33 -0000

Hi Pete,

I like the suggestion below; anyone else have an issue with incorporating it?

Cheers,

> 
>> On Oct 28, 2022, at 01:13, Pete Resnick via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> This paragraph in section 4 struck me oddly:
>> 
>>  An extension member (see Section 3.2) MAY occur in the Problem field
>>  if its name is compatible with the syntax of Dictionary keys (see
>>  Section 3.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and if the defining problem type
>>  specifies a Structured Type to serialize the value into.
>> 
>> That almost sounds like what you want to say is:
>> 
>>  If an extension member (see Section 3.2) occurs in the Problem field,
>>  its name MUST be compatible with the syntax of Dictionary keys (see
>>  Section 3.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) and the defining problem type
>>  MUST specify a Structured Type to serialize the value into.
>> 
>> I'm curious if you are making a normative statement that would get lost in the
>> current form. But I'm not sure what the high-order bit here is, so I leave it
>> to you.

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status