IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [httpapi] Martin Duke's Block on charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: (with BLOCK)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 10 September 2020 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C729B3A0E47; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HiN5omH6Q_oa; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f48.google.com (mail-io1-f48.google.com [209.85.166.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82E493A0E2F; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f48.google.com with SMTP id z25so7960182iol.10; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PZs/punzAZcI5I0G4+Q0a2J+DBBGq/XMTRA4gYIKrUE=; b=nBQZst41MMyWh3iSvsvFmyvgb3nkMQwb0oBG69TCSKBhcD6RAbxnTp0VS+mAYYxaez e65X+eQREuasD5aJ90XEtXCdY80TnLmpiuBfb2LA0SEN/xsZqcHeIO6/1uQ69f0Sj6ho zDs8/IK+sXH9nWatyUcppJmRKHDw3Ex2mFbVrGYZWEF4k3ubHTqeXS4G9V5TY+tNs07D mespKJVO8/Crsu80cf8diArvuaU4QSmKvTm09bULKYnjwegQnAmnAyfhbiZaSXJtR3uU XYVIKNoK/w/nP/Lh0bnlZb/O/1+7211V6ZHM7Mjye22D1QjMDBDTajZcZ9TJKuAcxyKS tNKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iP3inymXvkso+imimdkflJxcbbxEWS1f0jLc7TLfjqiQu1d+n Qs7o6rT+w/3kokUEq/xxmfEeszNuRiJEsdGU93M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbGXHeHQV2bmy9PloW44tbREx/hUeRiHq5fK3pXiXv6/kQ3AyuIYJvDaGEU0/dr+PBEEs9n+RqYzBKgI4pC+U=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:9149:: with SMTP id b9mr9444522jag.50.1599758919686; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159958075822.806.6403222206022210649@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJ+avKC05HEkRXiw9qwgzMvGtwqaj=mreCc+k3WkNem99Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxT-JH5VqAnn+J+JRYMLEAGsM4-XCE+Nd8kiH_NAT42W_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxT-JH5VqAnn+J+JRYMLEAGsM4-XCE+Nd8kiH_NAT42W_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:28:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLmh7RUFAwJzWmZwODm2UxzCgKpcMSy2QYfHYtOF5K5Lg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, httpapi@ietf.org, httpapi-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/A9osN5gSPFtEbp1hY7w2ySEeVBw>
Subject: Re: [httpapi] Martin Duke's Block on charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:28:42 -0000

> I'm in the same boat as Alissa. I can live with this is a provisional standing WG that takes
> whatever comes in, for now, but if there's a probation period it should be in the charter.

What do the two of you think about a provision to review the charter
and WG progress annually, at each year's 3rd IETF meeting?

Barry

> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:31 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>>
>> The -00-01 version of the proposed charter includes Mark's latest
>> edits.  Martin, will you check it and let us know what you think?
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Martin Duke via Datatracker
>> <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
>> > charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: Block
>> >
>> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> > introductory paragraph, however.)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-httpapi/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > BLOCK:
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > I certainly support creation of a working group of this nature; however, from
>> > the charter I have no idea what portion of this large problem space constitutes
>> > the short-term objectives of this group.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email