Re: [httpapi] Martin Duke's Block on charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: (with BLOCK)

[Martin Duke <[e-mail]>]

If that's in there, I would remove my BLOCK.

However, I wonder why we wouldn't just hold a WG forming BOF to figure out
what they're going to do, rather than form the WG and then figure out the
initial objectives. The latter has the same first meeting while also having
less organizational overhead.

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:28 AM Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> > I'm in the same boat as Alissa. I can live with this is a provisional
> standing WG that takes
> > whatever comes in, for now, but if there's a probation period it should
> be in the charter.
>
> What do the two of you think about a provision to review the charter
> and WG progress annually, at each year's 3rd IETF meeting?
>
> Barry
>
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 9:31 AM Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The -00-01 version of the proposed charter includes Mark's latest
> >> edits.  Martin, will you check it and let us know what you think?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Martin Duke via Datatracker
> >> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> >> > charter-ietf-httpapi-00-00: Block
> >> >
> >> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> >> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> this
> >> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-httpapi/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > BLOCK:
> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > I certainly support creation of a working group of this nature;
> however, from
> >> > the charter I have no idea what portion of this large problem space
> constitutes
> >> > the short-term objectives of this group.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
>