IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [httpapi] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpapi-link-template-02

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 24 May 2023 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E37C151B07 for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2023 02:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M5ZliCEmqoBt for <httpapi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2023 02:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46662C1516EB for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2023 02:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1684921066; i=julian.reschke@gmx.de; bh=elBMzFIwYc9yVERBj4x9dt5M2rcgwimqtBH+w7fHdGc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=qK4yZ6ave7pHTaozE4trkec4eIZzLk/tujU3HnzqnUxHNpmmnL572VgdOZkRY8va8 aMAZRZGJL/pVEF4mBtw9OgFKUQdaCg94XK/5sAX/BGAn46abVYNvsvK+f1b1ZTtwV2 nR1MVKkUE4I+6CCWpTWjoZB/+uFd5ZUtCxzBbzc1OtWiTIHYX2NOeUcZCDNx+Or+YV Y+dyqrllL2eEf1UXE8BP8SwsvQ5ShoSGmEXGoe8y1vMB6UUCGd1cYfhr7fuU4BA6Rk VdiGcmg6vrSS3iTikr/ZTVtTLuusF0LkIYXtj0EH7p33slECUQqv4QAaYCCBsp8V0y bFW0yJbNz9yEg==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([91.61.50.118]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MhD6g-1qfkKG0m3O-00eJww for <httpapi@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2023 11:37:46 +0200
Message-ID: <1aa55a85-ab66-2e73-a40a-c8ed4b9bf2b9@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 11:37:43 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: httpapi@ietf.org
References: <168424064858.44084.3692769234533396629@ietfa.amsl.com> <34AA44A9-B351-4798-8920-90724F600D8D@mnot.net> <HE1PR07MB4441A4329BA51DC42C9796DE937C9@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <C5848939-4628-4760-B1B7-ECB7105B866A@mnot.net> <HE1PR07MB4441C788DC81233E50441297937C9@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <EE952FBC-B0A4-4818-A288-1B320B469D5E@mnot.net> <HE1PR07MB4441EFC69B1BDFED17CDFFE293439@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <HE1PR07MB4441359730E81FABD0A385AB93439@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <913BDEE9-26F8-4391-AB57-A40D07C41EE4@mnot.net>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <913BDEE9-26F8-4391-AB57-A40D07C41EE4@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:vVNOLDstIt+ZRDFP0C+ToCadzxw8cIoWNMi0M8Lc5ZEBLErdnNX NSHFyHq9mX3RAbMMtFP/gmcK7MvoBara0OQlrQca/86jh2kBRBRIDiwLlzQZx60qgYIQAge irOvEKq/Yw+nsuHKnluyawb1rTUI7C7djeEAdCoF8qldGm92E+TpQIXNOq0qd67BDEdOeJ0 ODHFsn1Fzqr9XYCitYd1Q==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:gPXARd+6VkE=;JXYWbFWudOQ4IkKG43ReumABkMS +/nkjtPd4tz3gdeEzPMNBT84zbGQzeUxJ11YHgg1BAVCCUnqaClQx1vneQ8OMtGr79j67bW+R ANJiECReRDuAAzAeAKzbGcoVDOrBNmp2Do92KFp47uxfKi2Ex3f6AnjYlIDubu7cQpcX1b9oL zVGcAt0APJ9vlKyCQAWYGxH0ae5129AE16RYf5pxcKlDb9XekDv4vfUPbknMF8mjSLaxbGlpE uFVk0XNJud1qF8j8bSmVTHUDBHYOARflF6Wd5Cxk7+A9A8ZB5Scjt4VFtNDCzUSJcDtXcBbkx AYJWu2lv5Fbsbrq56s4Zo2HoV0uJ3VrooiMAu2GAO4/hKXxrLRt2EGeSr30iPsto3xuQ9K7G+ QQIVr+rh37DaFAp/wLcD9MNApTSVb7KJ7TPuIpepEqqbhhmH/3lmBGjv20Y5cqg+lgv04aDQQ ZObD+aZNb3dgSF0MmJP2t0IE8d3kzbrIvjhp1C+5gGfTQTuIlpcbpvrQr4QaDKuoAxgbXpsc7 IGgZhUiyOhvxHgqL2/LXBuk8Z0mI1UUnR2B4s4fVOZGGx7jbCa0FRJ1JKhgbIkH75rSQuVHyR jcK3OTzl+RPxw8sx2sO2qG2bHxRl3uh9tB4xTq2VsECaBFnhMcZux4YDlB3z9qBexYdtKn+r9 b8PYekuyMW4+ikXgQuHrcV67jGc4sX7wlM9cOq1Uv2LlfO1lFYs12FEs1oIro1cDRZ4htlriY tEReJi3gS4D8yznvycja7nskFJ7keI2IuMj+SJN5f9yHtlZ7EyKlX/EzxSrmQ9BRf2n+MOxqu jbVxIMzKfaOuVyU7t/6nNJKbWZHK05gGyVa6CX+Nj3ZpoqoJvzbk2iwHWPabyCpFxaLdSnZv7 Erknv2T6NsSeVWWrxRmp7v0IzqUGb+8GM7VLX80zQ30JnKH5TbX9FhTvjt82UFLl5ur3WLEST 90RPEw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/httpapi/FRNEB8cjVNne1fnN-2qmV7qH37Q>
Subject: Re: [httpapi] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpapi-link-template-02
X-BeenThere: httpapi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Building Blocks for HTTP APIs <httpapi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/httpapi/>
List-Post: <mailto:httpapi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/httpapi>, <mailto:httpapi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 09:37:52 -0000

On 24.05.2023 01:52, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> The quotes in my examples weren't part of the value -- sorry for the confusion.
>
> The point is that SF is being retrofit here -- parameters are defined by applications that may not be aware that they're being used in a context that leverages SF, so we can't assume they'll follow SF syntactic rules. Doing so would require updating RFC8288 (and potentially breaking many existing applications).
>
> Cheers,

This is a new header field, right? So not a case of "retrofit".

I can understand the value of consistency with *Link*, but then we need
to say so clearly.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email