Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2

[Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>]

I think that we should adopt this.

But yikes, it got complicated while I wasn't looking.  FOUR flags,
none of which are very well justified in the text.  The implications
of those aren't very well explored either; does this mean that there
are multiple Bloom filters?  How do these flags interact?  Simple
example: what do I do with the contents of a frame that has the RESET
flag?

That needs some significant work.  I'm sure that there are reasonable
reasons for each of these, but given that I was concerned that it was
too complicated to implement in the original form, this really steps
it up a notch.

On 22 June 2016 at 07:52, Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]> wrote:
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kazuho-h2-cache-digest-01>
>
> This draft has been discussed both out in the community and at our meetings, and there seems to be a decent amount of interest in it. So, this is a Call for Adoption to add it to our set of working documents.
>
> Please state whether you support adoption, and ideally why. Expressions of interest in implementation would also be very helpful.
>
> We'll wait at least one week before making a decision.
>
> N.B. Because I'm co-author on the draft, Natasha Rooney has kindly agreed to judge consensus on the CfA, and act as Document Shepherd if we do adopt it.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>