Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Fri, 24 June 2016 04:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C467F12D61F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E8KWqnlYdnbY for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCE412D57B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 21:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bGIbF-000337-RK for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:20:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:20:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bGIbF-000337-RK@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1bGIb1-0001K8-Qb for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:19:59 +0000
Received: from [121.99.228.82] (helo=treenet.co.nz) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1bGIb0-0008Rx-7s for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 04:19:59 +0000
Received: from [192.168.20.251] (unknown [121.98.40.13]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AD6E6FA8 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:19:27 +1200 (NZST)
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <040BA5C3-6CA3-4183-9B33-20D8F7A5CA16@mnot.net>
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Message-ID: <3a9dd336-a843-8665-a7e1-54c26fcb7556@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:19:16 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <040BA5C3-6CA3-4183-9B33-20D8F7A5CA16@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=121.99.228.82; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.193, BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bGIb0-0008Rx-7s bb99f57717abf8f69a5a3777d0dc317c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/3a9dd336-a843-8665-a7e1-54c26fcb7556@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31779
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 22/06/2016 6:52 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kazuho-h2-cache-digest-01>
> 
> This draft has been discussed both out in the community and at our meetings, and there seems to be a decent amount of interest in it. So, this is a Call for Adoption to add it to our set of working documents.
> 
> Please state whether you support adoption, and ideally why. Expressions of interest in implementation would also be very helpful.
> 
> We'll wait at least one week before making a decision.
> 

Since discussino has already promoted my fellow coworkers to break the
silence I think it safe to say that the Squid team supports this draft.

While I dont expect to see us developing an implementation for a while
yet. It is great progress on a needed function that we are likely to
make use of eventually.


Amos Jeffries
The Squid Softare Foundation