Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 22 June 2016 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DDC12D1A2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvmNzVCVTK5c for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A835B12D095 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bFc2S-00004t-Ss for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 06:53:28 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 06:53:28 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bFc2S-00004t-Ss@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1bFc2M-0008Vm-OP for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 06:53:22 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1bFc2L-0006SR-10 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 06:53:22 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [120.149.194.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BDED22E253; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 02:52:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:52:55 +1000
Message-Id: <040BA5C3-6CA3-4183-9B33-20D8F7A5CA16@mnot.net>
Cc: Natasha Rooney <nrooney@gsma.com>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.339, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bFc2L-0006SR-10 cf3f9c807e500d82270a6efab23b533a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Call for Adoption: Cache Digests for HTTP/2
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/040BA5C3-6CA3-4183-9B33-20D8F7A5CA16@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31746
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kazuho-h2-cache-digest-01>

This draft has been discussed both out in the community and at our meetings, and there seems to be a decent amount of interest in it. So, this is a Call for Adoption to add it to our set of working documents.

Please state whether you support adoption, and ideally why. Expressions of interest in implementation would also be very helpful.

We'll wait at least one week before making a decision.

N.B. Because I'm co-author on the draft, Natasha Rooney has kindly agreed to judge consensus on the CfA, and act as Document Shepherd if we do adopt it.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/