Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND
"Martin Nilsson" <nilsson@opera.com> Tue, 16 April 2013 02:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7333B21F914C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oZn+s51b-oGv for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C963A21F9195 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1URvOj-0008Eh-2y for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:13:29 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:13:29 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1URvOj-0008Eh-2y@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nilsson@opera.com>) id 1URvOh-0008E2-2v for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:13:27 +0000
Received: from smtp.opera.com ([213.236.208.81]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <nilsson@opera.com>) id 1URvOf-0002cO-MO for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:13:27 +0000
Received: from beryllium.bredbandsbolaget.se (c-741de353.03-25-6c6b7010.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [83.227.29.116]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.opera.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id r3G2CvRK021275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:12:58 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <516B8824.8040904@cisco.com> <DF8F6DB7E5D58B408041AE4D927B2F48CBB88103@CINURCNA14.e2k.ad.ge.com> <CAP+FsNfeUtKfOMPKriYP7Ak_YzsjEFKvprJOAQaxYP7_BxTBsw@mail.gmail.com> <cf53405c48dc431693573a9148776c8a@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOdDvNpidZwfMS_y_Hy56UjOaD9uNi-s=B9MErQSq4Msd3oBKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:12:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
Organization: Opera Software
Message-ID: <op.wvl23t2miw9drz@beryllium.bredbandsbolaget.se>
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNpidZwfMS_y_Hy56UjOaD9uNi-s=B9MErQSq4Msd3oBKw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.15 (Win32)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=213.236.208.81; envelope-from=nilsson@opera.com; helo=smtp.opera.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.556, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1URvOf-0002cO-MO c62e9067a5bf27fda9e92831d86f68ea
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wvl23t2miw9drz@beryllium.bredbandsbolaget.se>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17245
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:45:11 +0200, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote: > > If we break down the arbitrary layer barrier and inject some history into > the algorithm, in this case via SETTINGS, you get something more powerful > than a default constant. Shouldn't the first option be to attempt injecting this history without breaking layers, like adding a TCP option? /Martin Nilsson -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
- HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Jitu Padhye
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Roberto Peon
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Robert Collins
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Patrick McManus
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Roberto Peon
- RE: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Gabriel Montenegro
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Eliot Lear
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Mark Nottingham
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Roberto Peon
- RE: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Gabriel Montenegro
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Roberto Peon
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Roberto Peon
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Roberto Peon
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Patrick McManus
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Martin Nilsson
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Roberto Peon
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Eliot Lear
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Roberto Peon
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Roberto Peon
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Wesley Eddy
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Patrick McManus
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Yuchung Cheng
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Eggert, Lars
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Nandita Dukkipati
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Wesley Eddy
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Eliot Lear
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Eggert, Lars
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Eggert, Lars
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Peter Lepeska
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND William Chan (陈智昌)
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Peter Lepeska
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND William Chan (陈智昌)
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Peter Lepeska
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND William Chan (陈智昌)
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Peter Lepeska
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND William Chan (陈智昌)
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Peter Lepeska
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Mark Nottingham
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Eliot Lear
- Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND Yuchung Cheng