IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Frame size errors

Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Tue, 23 September 2014 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A651A8757 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jM2VBOTXy0z6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 368BC1A1B23 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XWTIc-0003hA-7l for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:50:46 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:50:46 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XWTIc-0003hA-7l@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1XWTIF-0003dY-Fv for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:50:23 +0000
Received: from mail-bn1on0117.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.110.117] helo=na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1XWTIA-0003Og-N6 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:50:23 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.24) by BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1034.13; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:49:52 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.126]) by BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.126]) with mapi id 15.00.1034.003; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:49:51 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: Frame size errors
Thread-Index: AQHP10zDaT/Xo6GpyEawv0qN5ajvnZwO7hdQ
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:49:51 +0000
Message-ID: <6832c7a4d310426cb5313d8217597333@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABkgnnUMkiGfM1shACLBwbnG8J8UAdL_W_ow4T2BMXfMoHXRGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUMkiGfM1shACLBwbnG8J8UAdL_W_ow4T2BMXfMoHXRGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:ee31::2]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2PR03MB132;
x-forefront-prvs: 0343AC1D30
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(199003)(377454003)(13464003)(85306004)(21056001)(64706001)(85852003)(76482002)(15975445006)(95666004)(74316001)(106116001)(105586002)(101416001)(106356001)(107886001)(31966008)(46102003)(90102001)(76576001)(107046002)(77982003)(20776003)(83072002)(108616004)(77096002)(2656002)(33646002)(87936001)(86612001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(80022003)(79102003)(99396002)(92566001)(74502003)(86362001)(81342003)(99286002)(50986999)(74662003)(97736003)(81542003)(54356999)(4396001)(76176999)(120916001)(83322001)(10300001)(3826002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR03MB132; H:BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=157.56.110.117; envelope-from=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com; helo=na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.146, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XWTIA-0003Og-N6 4c105498edbf25e97d264f1c9af4c015
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Frame size errors
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/6832c7a4d310426cb5313d8217597333@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/27181
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Looks fine to me.

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:32 AM
To: HTTP Working Group
Subject: Frame size errors

I've prepared a pull request that tightens the restrictions on frame sizes.

https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/616

Brad Fitzpatrick raised issue #611 with identifying when a FRAME_SIZE_ERROR is appropriate.  I plan to answer the question by placing hard limits on frame size, requiring a FRAME_SIZE_ERROR in all cases where the frame size is undefined.  This should close the issue regarding what fields are open to (unnegotiated) extension.

Any objections to this change?  It's marked editorial in the tracker, but we're at a stage now that I think that substantive changes even as minor as this need to be raised here.  I'll hold this for a while and pull this in unless I hear screams.

v2.43.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status