Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt
Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> Wed, 20 August 2014 01:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EFF1A0739 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lBWMbpnEMSDR for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 987791A06D9 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XJuQ7-0005Zz-P6 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:10:35 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:10:35 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XJuQ7-0005Zz-P6@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gregw@intalio.com>) id 1XJuPp-0005Z7-U2 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:10:17 +0000
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gregw@intalio.com>) id 1XJuPo-0007GL-Jl for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 01:10:17 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id w62so7207723wes.36 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jqJS4nNRa/8c2BylX5dnRrLAf75MEV/gu5JjJLJb4VY=; b=F+wRxbbnQZK/z7BxtJEqDO/hhXL1NmUX3L90GfbYCcvbrUYtVQQWwsPRyf1vq3rqUe +B9+NUDQroRO2XA48KRhY3cIX6hKyPLuYGPmGe+B2OMM2114UauO4XHMJOyMc8cxx1uQ t3ok2Zh3xsLaJ6JieN9w+C3G5BFfX0hcJJef/9PCuG05dNjkoTpUkpj24L89IDUDqbz5 v45Rl1e7hskgMpUXapcft4zAd8XTakROUcMqRcBbNOnXr9o5XfPWuihgnQ9tjH85042D bTuVVmx63ZPaGvzhmxg9X6YCmp7vwlKc9XlT2naR5QkRECOvfh1NJ4m42dKmAeY3QPl/ cc6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVzh5EOAb8Na0ePW8mXQjoZ746ytfn6Az2WG3qVXmSrdHADfmXRJP0BmOJ8Bcsiqh6y4Ah
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.85.136 with SMTP id h8mr10833068wiz.67.1408496989676; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.169.98 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3859D490-6B6E-4C7D-A3AF-9F1CF6F69045@mnot.net>
References: <20140818233839.23251.81316.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <858FBAA8-F0D5-43A0-A621-7D504AB3327A@mnot.net> <CAH_y2NEekpgDNO+OsDELarcSi3nn72gHb98L9R66TntcD9bUiQ@mail.gmail.com> <3859D490-6B6E-4C7D-A3AF-9F1CF6F69045@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:09:49 +1000
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NGivMoS_WSudKKM4A=Jnr6bKneJZ5zuTmWrQm=XESYdYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0444e9b7bcaaaf05010542dc"
Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=74.125.82.177; envelope-from=gregw@intalio.com; helo=mail-we0-f177.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.042, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XJuPo-0007GL-Jl 2956246db803768dc2c897737767c2e4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAH_y2NGivMoS_WSudKKM4A=Jnr6bKneJZ5zuTmWrQm=XESYdYw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26672
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Mark, thanks for those links. I think the document itself needs to be a bit stronger on the intended usage of the header. Currently it reads that this header field can be sent by a client and that it can be ignored by the proxy. Perhaps it should be little bit stronger and say that a proxy MAY (SHOULD?) consider this header when deciding to create a tunnel or not. cheers On 20 August 2014 10:45, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Greg, > > See: > > https://httpwg.github.io/wg-materials/ietf90/IETF90_draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol.pdf > > https://github.com/httpwg/wg-materials/blob/gh-pages/ietf90/minutes.md#draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol > > Cheers, > > > On 20 Aug 2014, at 10:40 am, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > > > Mark, > > > > Is there a specific use-case motivating this additional header? ie are > there situations that a proxy can use this to do more than just log/debug a > tunnel? > > > > I'm certainly not opposed to having the additional information that this > header provides, but I'd like to know what advantage there is for a client > to include the header. If there is none, then it is not likely to be sent. > > > > cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> > > http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that > scales > > http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd. > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00… internet-drafts
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Greg Wilkins
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Greg Wilkins
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Adam Rice
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Amos Jeffries
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Adam Rice
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Amos Jeffries
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Martin Thomson
- RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Julian Reschke