IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09

Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> Mon, 14 November 2016 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFE612987D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:31:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wsnP8nBWLzP for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0994612987C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 08:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c6K6R-0000AW-K0 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:27:28 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:27:27 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c6K6R-0000AW-K0@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>) id 1c6K6J-00007u-OO; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:27:19 +0000
Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu ([128.2.157.38]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>) id 1c6K6E-0003Cs-2r; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:27:14 +0000
Received: from [172.31.25.154] (VPN-172-31-25-154.VPN.CMU.LOCAL [172.31.25.154]) (user=murch mech=PLAIN (0 bits)) by smtp.andrew.cmu.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uAEGQm1T091556 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:26:49 -0500
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
References: <147647657198.18541.16272058165406493619.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c01d2bd4-4495-ba7d-b3bd-3b3bab4314e2@gmx.de> <7fdc3595-9e50-3515-1822-ef13e9197518@gmx.de> <7e92cd24-569e-7eae-e9d9-397660ec0798@andrew.cmu.edu> <5869f8f6-0ded-16a6-e844-0a7e982e6936@gmx.de>
From: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon University
Message-ID: <6f7251a9-975b-f775-76fa-8b4d166e0ddb@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:26:48 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5869f8f6-0ded-16a6-e844-0a7e982e6936@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PMX-Version: 6.3.0.2556906, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2016.11.14.161518
X-SMTP-Spam-Clean: 8% ( HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_600_699 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, FROM_EDU_TLD 0, IN_REP_TO 0, LEGITIMATE_NEGATE 0, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS 0, MSG_THREAD 0, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, REFERENCES 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __FROM_HAS_AT 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NAME 0, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0, __TO_REAL_NAMES 0, __USER_AGENT 0)
X-SMTP-Spam-Score: 8%
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 128.2.157.38
Received-SPF: none client-ip=128.2.157.38; envelope-from=murch@andrew.cmu.edu; helo=smtp.andrew.cmu.edu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.849, BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.799, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c6K6E-0003Cs-2r ddf3887f8446b9c2ad1b4e0f13870291
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/6f7251a9-975b-f775-76fa-8b4d166e0ddb@andrew.cmu.edu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32896
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>


On 11/14/2016 09:41 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> If it supports this spec, it *will* ignore the Brief by definition, 
> right.
>
> So maybe just state that? "it will ignore..."?

Actually, my implementation supports Prefer but also doesn't ignore 
Brief.  It treats Brief:true as if Prefer:return=representation was sent 
in the request, regardless of whether Prefer was sent or not. I don't 
know if this is more appropriate than ignoring Brief, but we probably 
need a definitive statement on how a server should behave if both 
headers appear in a request.

-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email