Re: NEW ISSUE: Define "ought to"

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 05:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D4221F9CA6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.430, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l0DQ-+oxnOF0 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E03D21F9A14 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V4OXE-0006bV-98 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:01:16 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:01:16 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V4OXE-0006bV-98@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1V4OX5-0006ag-12 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:01:07 +0000
Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1V4OX4-0006Hd-DI for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:01:06 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f12so181693wgh.15 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=isDVSGzyTnaEIkFYae5Rr9ors3TPnPYZCjoXaE8E8Ys=; b=Yg0Hq+QZN1OjhNINz3TRYXERJ6A9xRT2qSLMOQFFxUpxqFWvKLouUvYOdZbrNWk3N4 yspOUr1QUA+SB6Cgym0+OLj0bX3v/79/WT1gptk9x1aTTr22LbXVUqK+kl2D5KOnOHt9 Q5OqKu0SfeAud1LbVxIAtOzGzoTV0x8lqN/O1hvfeVDbu70FL1TJssfGbfQ3hiA8nZfU 15s+iNJgL+FqEBZiWMJuXOt13644UOIjfp5UXOMr8kOB+1BOlfr7Z4jcP6nfIk3FrqEA xQ6yE+TRyPGIYG7dE2kl0aBmc9Z2hSDUpyMrlQ/vNSY9Mp7NYIXU5hnyJRIT+pozjQwA j9XA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.187.2 with SMTP id fo2mr1989911wic.65.1375246840295; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51F89572.1080506@dcrocker.net>
References: <51F7D951.3050204@bbs.darktech.org> <51F7DBF5.3030403@gmx.de> <51F89572.1080506@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:00:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXr9LfWjhS8B086z4iA8uUVU316rKrYtdiGJU5=Ym5HvA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.48; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f48.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.674, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1V4OX4-0006Hd-DI 13a955cea748b9de95d5aa443932f10b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE: Define "ought to"
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnXr9LfWjhS8B086z4iA8uUVU316rKrYtdiGJU5=Ym5HvA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18998
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 31 July 2013 06:41, Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> Well, the choice of non-normative vocabulary would do better to be for words
> and phrasing that are not too easily confused with the normative terms.
> Cognitive separation will help the reader.

I believe that RFC 6919 covers a lot of this ground already.