Re: NEW ISSUE: Define "ought to"

[cowwoc <[e-mail]>]

On 30/07/2013 5:45 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I'd say that "ought to" here in the HTTP spect is generally a good friend's
> advice from some other implementors that got trapped and know how to avoid
> this. There's nothing normative in what follows "ought to" so those who
> won't follow it will not cause harm and might only suffer themselves.
> SHOULD is a MUST with an exception if you know you can safely ignore it.

     That is an excellent explanation. Please consider adding it to 
section 1.1.

Thanks,
Gili