IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 15 April 2013 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D892921F90CC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 21:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nMMXPEZB-kRx for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 21:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C7D21F8EE1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 21:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1URbSK-0005Rz-S8 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 04:55:52 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 04:55:52 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1URbSK-0005Rz-S8@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1URbSG-0005RE-3Q for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 04:55:48 +0000
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com ([144.254.224.147]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1URbSF-0001wj-06 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 04:55:48 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3269; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1366001747; x=1367211347; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=aMby8LpvuXpV8MJAwA1kxgbruE3wsRurp6SuRlo7Ugo=; b=jRXqZvmPF/8LqETjKbKyOTWlmFDGoApoI2fV3Go0IIJwnX96jAWGE8gI TX2I+GUtXpy6OWUlXkB29KMwVFoDclY8lUTA1HhvA1+6NfXey6Xdzi8r6 6G/mXO+hgdJG69FO+ha/9J1HhWRjQZ/O56+XRU8IuFrJ9NhYcvCvOzO/G g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkwFAL2Ha1GQ/khR/2dsb2JhbABQgkJENoJpR4VeuBOBCBZ0gh8BAQEEIwpLARALBBQJFgsCAgkDAgECASsaBg0BBwEBiBAMqD6RYASPFweCLoETA5cFkRGDDTo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.87,473,1363132800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="13330858"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.72.81]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2013 04:55:03 +0000
Received: from mctiny.local ([10.61.161.48]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3F4t0rB001680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 04:55:01 GMT
Message-ID: <516B8824.8040904@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:55:00 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
CC: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Robert Collins <robertc@squid-cache.org>, Jitu Padhye <padhye@microsoft.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>, Rob Trace <Rob.Trace@microsoft.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@skype.net>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
References: <8e7e9a7db6204492afde5d8883570579@BN1PR03MB006.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAP+FsNeG4ew88sWs6OL+PQXbqSANE6smRTJuVBzo8ppkLVPYtA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3HoZ2zHBNpRw7NrVZO5UsdnPuW3ZiSu56ppM5fqhaP+5=uFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNf2NE+mH2a6KxdNan6oh1Uvb3LoVojCuU9kOV1aQs3WkQ@mail.gmail.com> <a9421189aa294987a1627019a3411902@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <a9421189aa294987a1627019a3411902@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090907040305060305010606"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=144.254.224.147; envelope-from=lear@cisco.com; helo=ams-iport-4.cisco.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.687, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.703, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1URbSF-0001wj-06 f24bdd6f5083da68730434d64496ccea
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 and TCP CWND
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/516B8824.8040904@cisco.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17224
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 4/12/13 11:52 PM, Gabriel Montenegro wrote:
>
> I’ve opened issue #65 to track what we should do about
> SETTINGS_CURRENT_CWND:
>
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/65
>
>  
>
> As for my opinion about what to do: I think we should delete this TCP
> congestion window setting from HTTP/2.0.
>

+1 for all the reasons Gabriel mentioned.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email