IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming

Craig Pratt <craig@ecaspia.com> Wed, 20 April 2016 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C76D12E25D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.193
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.193 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ecaspia-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbuLtyBHxTJU for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5987612DC5B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1aswnN-0004C9-Hn for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:24:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:24:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1aswnN-0004C9-Hn@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <craig@caspiaconsulting.com>) id 1aswnH-0004BO-KK for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:24:07 +0000
Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <craig@caspiaconsulting.com>) id 1aswnF-0006Rv-NZ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:24:07 +0000
Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fs9so20304220pac.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ecaspia-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N2JcelWFOkNP3LyodZcuMzlDj844yozUuigvaEePfjE=; b=rxmjNJl2A6fYXosfh4YZo8yhccELgXEFIFktUtENDW0+uM3CoZ+X1T5L9xYm2V2+w/ 4VMp/CgndKyGKWjrLUezEjYnJf9Qf2vKF2AMxwgZ7aqKOGj7Dyv8tVYJBSIXPsqwppHj oFqCyxyGUncbr1omrfTppI5rYnQOlOoPp3bN5kN6iCl5/ZvTAEJuNgPMzd/tsKeYt+HG M3H4F7AOuVv2m4Z+dESztIQppEvIOm8MHUL7NS+Yk6V1V0lnrLGHr4rVItOXZJPd3rYu UmE2u6cff9JxX/bKt2GE6nKlHyqreGDNnsOVrXiMcbb8aaqmpBPCdZxDg5q/3nQbbkQC AggA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N2JcelWFOkNP3LyodZcuMzlDj844yozUuigvaEePfjE=; b=k0JhTpv1BXEBgyRaSMYrve6kFUowB9dAxTFHpcHft5cl8xp3KxIe+HBJ4yp8te6pb2 WAgUm6xzjIbp/AZRWiv3GF0+anMw8rnseA2Gz4vcWd+Ry4tsccimO7DWXmrJfFoLKtWE A1oJ+cgcy5W/zNsWj0JHUDXSvAuU52pUl/NYXbuMQX7qT5n7S8E+Va7yXNENq3dB3foU AK2rp6sB8tX4nnXH+iimY+TxG+3uuNNGTSHkDQuriqI90K3vDKh1NhXemhHLE5dx5eJF HpZop5hyXuFE/NbLSR7bAMzZFVuW4iYeX9oGEuzBt4hXxhwr2rzBnvZZuEC1GYdLHAhi UBSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWfpLjcziKMUvSN4knuTrCrfreFpLoWcXwf4hyuFOJq//jjAw2QMW8oW4YDEN7lew==
X-Received: by 10.66.141.144 with SMTP id ro16mr14229373pab.137.1461176619260; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.1.104] (50-193-209-61-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.193.209.61]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a205sm32265848pfa.6.2016.04.20.11.23.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <57102718.7010900@ecaspia.com> <432331E0-4FD1-44E6-8F50-C12BF1852192@mnot.net> <5716019B.4030104@ecaspia.com> <7B9F91C2-E152-49A1-A762-215CB1534DB2@mnot.net>
Cc: IETF HTTP BIS <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Craig Pratt <craig@ecaspia.com>
Organization: Caspia Consulting
Message-ID: <5717C929.2030900@ecaspia.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:23:37 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7B9F91C2-E152-49A1-A762-215CB1534DB2@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.50; envelope-from=craig@caspiaconsulting.com; helo=mail-pa0-f50.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.590, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1aswnF-0006Rv-NZ 9d93be7a65a1747873a60de98d0d8106
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5717C929.2030900@ecaspia.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31526
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 4/20/16 12:50 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

      

        
On 19 Apr 2016, at 7:59 PM, Craig Pratt <craig@ecaspia.com> wrote:

How about "b-live"?


      

      
Better. If we choose to mint a new range-unit, it might be an opportunity to make other changes too, in which case it might be more generic; that would imply a different, more general name. But we're not there yet.

Cheers,


    

    [cp] I'll see what I can come up with and revise the draft (and try
    to not think about that "yet" you have on there... ;^J)...

    

    

      

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/" rel="nofollow">https://www.mnot.net/



    

    

    

    
-- 

      
      
      
      
      
      
      

        
          

            
              
craig pratt

              
Caspia Consulting

              
craig@ecaspia.com

              
503.746.8008

            		
            
              


              

            		
            
              


              

            		
          

        
      

      


      

    

  


      
    

    

      
    


 




            


        



      
 


      

        
      

          
    
 

    


 

    



    






    

    


    
  
    
  

      
v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email