IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 20 April 2016 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C8612D988 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1rVd4_x2bVjS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA5C212D8B7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1asmuM-0005NH-Jr for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:50:46 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:50:46 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1asmuM-0005NH-Jr@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1asmuE-0005MW-DZ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:50:38 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1asmu9-00069c-Nt for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:50:35 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [120.149.194.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0628122E259; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 03:50:08 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <5716019B.4030104@ecaspia.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:50:05 +1000
Cc: IETF HTTP BIS <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7B9F91C2-E152-49A1-A762-215CB1534DB2@mnot.net>
References: <57102718.7010900@ecaspia.com> <432331E0-4FD1-44E6-8F50-C12BF1852192@mnot.net> <5716019B.4030104@ecaspia.com>
To: Craig Pratt <craig@ecaspia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.358, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1asmu9-00069c-Nt ac6f3c71e194a51ce15c78bb27b6aaba
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Issue with "bytes" Range Unit and live streaming
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/7B9F91C2-E152-49A1-A762-215CB1534DB2@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/31519
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 19 Apr 2016, at 7:59 PM, Craig Pratt <craig@ecaspia.com> wrote:
> 
> How about "b-live"?

Better. If we choose to mint a new range-unit, it might be an opportunity to make other changes too, in which case it might be more generic; that would imply a different, more general name. But we're not there yet.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email