IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 2 questions

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 31 March 2015 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F88A1A8789 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8An4YHaHXF3Z for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4886F1A1B80 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Yd3N9-0004Ar-6s for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:06:55 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:06:55 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Yd3N9-0004Ar-6s@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>) id 1Yd3N2-00049O-4u for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:06:48 +0000
Received: from [134.226.56.6] (helo=mercury.scss.tcd.ie) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>) id 1Yd3N0-0001pN-8h for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:06:48 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6095BED4; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:06:17 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hP7zpqrMLBqH; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:06:16 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.46.29.244]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C98C0BEB3; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:06:16 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <551B0C46.8040705@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:06:14 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, Xiaoyin Liu <xiaoyin.l@outlook.com>, Dan Anderson <dan-anderson@cox.net>, "Walter H." <walter.h@mathemainzel.info>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
References: <emb9aea729-e991-4f83-bd83-960342d99b87@bodybag>
In-Reply-To: <emb9aea729-e991-4f83-bd83-960342d99b87@bodybag>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: none client-ip=134.226.56.6; envelope-from=stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; helo=mercury.scss.tcd.ie
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.046, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RDNS_NONE=1.274, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1Yd3N0-0001pN-8h e5d95b9e785dfb71d5c73db043121042
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: 2 questions
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/551B0C46.8040705@cs.tcd.ie>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29141
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hiya,

On 31/03/15 21:49, Adrien de Croy wrote:
> 
> So whilst very interesting, I don't know if we can really draw too much
> from this study alone.  It would be very interesting to see the results
> redone at say yearly intervals.

Yep, longitudinal studies are valuable in things like this. I'd
be surprised if there wasn't being done by someone right now tbh.
Meanwhile, the take-away is clearly that MitM deployment is one of
those things that's (ab:-)used about 0.41% of the time and should
be treated as such and that claims to the contrary are anecdotal.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email