Re: If not JSON, what then ?

"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Mon, 01 August 2016 10:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8250412D5AE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 03:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UKyX65usM6_2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 03:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7479212D567 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 03:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bU9ys-0006mX-0P for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:57:54 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:57:54 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bU9ys-0006mX-0P@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1bU9yn-0006lm-UH for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:57:49 +0000
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk ([130.225.244.222]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1bU9yl-0006wE-F0 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:57:49 +0000
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.55.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E995A273CE; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:57:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u719vPxM084605; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:57:25 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
In-reply-to: <20160801085743.GB22715@1wt.eu>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <77778.1470037414@critter.freebsd.dk> <20160801085743.GB22715@1wt.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <84603.1470045445.1@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:57:25 +0000
Message-ID: <84604.1470045445@critter.freebsd.dk>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=130.225.244.222; envelope-from=phk@phk.freebsd.dk; helo=phk.freebsd.dk
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.822, BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.245, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1bU9yl-0006wE-F0 0d70bbcac1f559261c57a04b431f2e5d
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: If not JSON, what then ?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/84604.1470045445@critter.freebsd.dk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32111
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

--------
In message <20160801085743.GB22715@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:

>That made me think that most of the header fields I'm seeing do not use
>non-ascii characters at all, I'd even say non-printable-ascii. Most of
>them contain :
>  - host names (Host)
>  - uris (Referer, Location)
>  - user-agent strings (UA)
>  - tokens (Connection, Accept, ...)
>  - numbers
>
>Thus in fact I'm wondering if it's really worth focusing the efforts on
>non-ascii strings instead.

My take is that the data-model and serialization should be general
and unconstrained, and the constraints be applied in a/the schema
for each individual header.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.