Re: p1: HTTP(S) URIs and fragment identifiers

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 22 April 2013 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475DF21F8948 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T2g66R1uhsII for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420E021F88C7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UU7jc-0002oc-Im for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:48:08 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:48:08 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UU7jc-0002oc-Im@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UU7jU-0002nt-M5 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:48:00 +0000
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net ([216.86.168.183]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UU7jT-0000HF-Tp for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:48:00 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.190.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15D2A50A87 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:47:37 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <EBBA02BC-CAAF-4CE3-807F-85D87A9D30C8@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:47:34 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9582B7B6-82B9-472E-9E35-B6113466D138@mnot.net>
References: <EBBA02BC-CAAF-4CE3-807F-85D87A9D30C8@mnot.net>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.183; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-08.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.424, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UU7jT-0000HF-Tp 4564b739d48a1196f0af7e49f27124f0
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: p1: HTTP(S) URIs and fragment identifiers
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/9582B7B6-82B9-472E-9E35-B6113466D138@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17449
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Now:
  http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/451

On 20/04/2013, at 2:07 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> P1 sections 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 define the HTTP and HTTPS URI schemes without fragment identifiers.
> 
> While it's true that HTTP sends these URIs without fragids "on the wire" in the request-target, the schemes *do* allow fragids pretty much everywhere else they're used (including some places in HTTP, e.g., the Location header).
> 
> Given that this is going to be the definition for these URI schemes, and we already require that the fragid be omitted in the request-target, shouldn't the syntax allow a fragment identifier?
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/