Re: Time to refresh HTTP/2?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 28 August 2020 11:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEC73A0924 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.948, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sz_mA79U5CHd for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F33793A0938 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1kBc6M-0007Et-QT for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:59:22 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:59:22 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1kBc6M-0007Et-QT@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1kBc6K-0007E8-Gg for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:59:20 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1kBc6H-0001XS-Re for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 10:59:20 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1598612345; bh=XKsoEBUjnryJKP2nVP7ZpbiWVxfRYbCgs7t9gdM546o=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=c+3AvS+Xeh4ZlUbqVbjYZvxY6EmDi2+O6GEji7wdpzFJ5YfcH6GfJz2KpbRhCpbiM MOYu/wkB7Qjh2aUTJPO5tkXKuWiQaMzzRmiBt1AzGn6W3ABMstf2/Bs86tNUUh7M94 xJnVxb3GN9NhZIHq9Hq8rH15Y9jMJMuX2GTkIeA0=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.236] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MG9g4-1kNhy90RFk-00GcfC for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:59:05 +0200
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <4facac0f-867d-4947-840c-fcd675a09d51@www.fastmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <785148de-dd24-6446-2430-759d580a8984@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 12:59:03 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4facac0f-867d-4947-840c-fcd675a09d51@www.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:7/lkRaKmNLQgz4CzzO5dDCbngtIFUgpJtc3wJHcgZzMnximXh5v u+FH0HeumdUnjA/E+YSWT2uEutRl44bErpdJSQLht3VE9NudXk445XdYscniR0jP4j7IdrR K6MYZFJO9ZQ0LuSkIIBaxv7pP2P3mi4UFra2a9fngCZSX4vjuz1KEw8SJdu3s/eFNj6HMTi dQqDF1BLZg88BeEiYPVRA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:7bRrD+R1TbY=:6X65FuiYaCbOHUCXWBBzXa 3SLrnNrqwW24GA7GbsIUs1wM8TLTed12lLKURCj65UoOYunFsp2Pwp/NUVT15eSXyqsycRXKD dOIAS95BjUpdfvsBJfzTWNNLkU/jtGMfZ/wHs+beHnU+NI1WDmjiJgPafrherjvgf3C4JTXwS LBqJFsH+CG1ozsyg8Xk7QplqDZfRI3r47R/BD7sQ0w5w6rpLUlFz032ZlgGUfOZ1ThvKFcIps F8YHST3jYLjnvRVlOLEIR0iAQq4gIXa3Lll7CRYkS/nBMejKDea6jCcbifQrqzJu22QvAvoCu kAeTTXoEIJC79ZA4gcrgfS3jgB7nVWfikSh5iV9BbAsXcbaz3cfldUVRRvriWz2ItBNQ/k42C 0xIbg/mW3Z6KmBDgMlpmFpCpOf8NGy4fODECuday781yB0z7/7OjjZVsihq+KnmNa+8OI6xrV BQhPfIKj2t2uz1JKZceVaUQdpy+/2626TFWyw2KErF3Sm7QtySAEtfdbSZLih/JwLaMw0phrT qo8rAP29oWk3frOgnKqZpxQ4pl0/XYjzKi5Ry6M0FeiAOZXEjUYmK/By1NUkykSzuZmXMy5Aa m8s0kwiJG8bB8wiqE5S9daD6pK6vAxNKCA9mgTb7Z2bVqKKYBvecCdgeJyqBvuL6+wc8h5diB 8imlMcBQ0LtZ9xS5eJmgSSrUZm7/rEfvgTw0K7L1skepDyMj3ZDMWyPnI7jJspn3gAyRvW3VG 94q2vlLbXop+UQaGFx3K0up6/VT6MAaXJQLXrAVUYTBzxAbGzV1AYUBhGtB1cygdPhcK3yMIz DBP0riRxgomgc9v4S1Wx623DRu4GJip31Ko0nrcF7a7IHYfhxk74TqmcKNCiWNHtqRYZuY5vT 9LX8JVMbmcyEwgOzV82jbhzvbMBvB94W7hq6fCaX1z0FpwFjsf0YQ9YlYb53lUrnH3UDTieki rxDBTZYoVEUedmHgvQgp7mFS8iU9ghPwcf0zZtNhRD45GkrhLdJ8ze/11qYVIPQ4dPDe0ai13 hrMwyPcv6SvEffNZb0PUKPyRqX2ZNokxSh9LW2MDudETqkyPdIcEFgjZdbP4GSRlJdBRbWlHf rCSsSFKET6cBocJgCOAaGpqAQKSwCR0+tiQPW62xFZPIqWp9raddVeKWDqGwJto9ed4sIGCzh qyMvG0Qmod3HmoLk0E4B8TDtj1+Z+wzEPOwMj2LBlAXzC6WHKcKf3hCnWHzTt5N2ZPK6HFpzW WZiy7qF0m46wlb5su0DolyPgbHxamTfNOXuuu5w==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.809, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1kBc6H-0001XS-Re ac6781f740841bd7310786ed40ab02c7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Time to refresh HTTP/2?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/785148de-dd24-6446-2430-759d580a8984@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37966
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Am 28.08.2020 um 09:15 schrieb Martin Thomson:
> All this tiresome talk about terminology got me thinking about the value of action over words.
>
> So, I present to you a proposed update to RFC 7540:
>
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00
>
> This only does:
>
> * removes unnecessarily divisive terminology
> * rolls up errata
>
> Obviously, there is a long and slippery slope of things that we might do from this point.  However, I think that it would be good if we could just publish a minimal update without getting embroiled in difficult and time-consuming design questions.
>
> The diff is mostly just stuff that xml2rfc does differently five years on:
>
>    https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://ietf.org/rfc/rfc7540.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00.txt
>
> Or you can peruse the individual changes I made:
>
>    https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/compare/master...martinthomson:main

+1

Actually, I was going to suggest that as well, but mainly to align
HTTP/2 with the new core specs - it would be good to say how the cleanup
affects the references from HTTP/2.

Best regards, Julian