Re: [hybi] New charter for HyBi wg

[John Tamplin <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Jesse McConnell
<[e-mail]>wrote:

> Is it safe to assume that the starting place for the mux extension
> will be John's google-mux draft?  If so, would it make sense to start
> off the extensions discussions there, or does it make more sense to
> work on some 'official' simple extensions before tackling that more
> complex one?  I am a bit torn on where it would be best to start.  I
> would like to see the mux 'official' as soon as possible but I am
> unclear if individual extensions could have much of an effect on the
> mux extension or vis versa.
>
> Just curious as he has some nice work done there which could be a nice
> starting point.
>

If someone has an alternate proposal, that is fine, but in the absence of
that I suggest http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tamplin-hybi-google-mux-01 is
as good a place to start as any.

I suspect per-frame compression will be easier to get agreement on, and so
could be completed more quickly.  There is a pressing need for both, but
shortest-job-first scheduling gets something useful deployed faster.

-- 
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google