Re: [hybi] New charter for HyBi wg

Is it safe to assume that the starting place for the mux extension
will be John's google-mux draft?  If so, would it make sense to start
off the extensions discussions there, or does it make more sense to
work on some 'official' simple extensions before tackling that more
complex one?  I am a bit torn on where it would be best to start.  I
would like to see the mux 'official' as soon as possible but I am
unclear if individual extensions could have much of an effect on the
mux extension or vis versa.

Just curious as he has some nice work done there which could be a nice
starting point.

cheers,
jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:21, Alexey Melnikov
<alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 20/01/2012 12:45, John Tamplin wrote:
>  [...]
>
>> This sounds fine to me -- from the sequence of milestones, I assume we
>> would be working on these serially rather than in parallel, is that right?
>
>
> In general this is up to the WG chairs. They may or may not allow for some
> level of parallel processing. But the main idea is to concentrate on things
> listed first.
>
>> Regarding the dates, I think they are fine as a target, but I think it is
>> likely to change as we start the discussions.  Also, given the timeline of
>> the base spec the dates seem perhaps optimistic :).
>
>
> They might be optimistic, but they can be adjusted later on.
>
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi