IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] Issue tracker

Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com> Sun, 23 May 2010 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <gregw@webtide.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D453A6359 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.139, BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d8iYk-rgU-pm for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7254C3A67B3 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so1966891wwb.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.155.65 with SMTP id i43mr2758450wek.98.1274650525668; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.52.9 with HTTP; Sun, 23 May 2010 14:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BF94D27.9080904@caucho.com>
References: <4BEA99E9.5050308@ericsson.com> <4BEAF8F6.80709@ericsson.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005130134240.8532@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BEBC177.3030201@ericsson.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005132116210.12269@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BF27670.1000607@ericsson.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005182055280.22838@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BF3A31B.5090208@ericsson.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1005230558070.22838@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BF94D27.9080904@caucho.com>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 23:35:25 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTin6ful_1I6Sxq2WPVJv81tYQkk1oCGI7LSwjvZZ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
To: hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [hybi] Issue tracker
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 21:35:37 -0000

On 23 May 2010 17:43, Scott Ferguson <ferg@caucho.com> wrote:
> Correct. It's clear the spec will not reflect the consensus.

Scott,

The fundamental problem is that Ian as editor of the draft does not
appear willing to accept the consensus view if he thinks it contradicts his
personal view of what is technically sound.  He  rejects the concept
that technical soundness can be determined by rough consensus.

As such, I do not believe that the IETF process can work  with Ian as editor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email