Re: [I18ndir] HTML, email addresses, etc

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 10 June 2020 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1D33A158A for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.753
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.753 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nVLgbCnTsVw1 for <i18ndir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from antelope.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (antelope.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B3A83A1589 for <i18ndir@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:53:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7569212C8; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:53:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a89.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-137-10.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.137.10]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C19AB9214EE; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:53:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a89.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.8); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:53:54 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Cold-Arch: 5e8c6a282b61d06d_1591829633977_3381360791
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1591829633976:3186724182
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1591829633976
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a89.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a89.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400109D73A; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=p+LBLr7zA0OsM6 qrxhgupZHkURc=; b=yx+yFdl99x630yEILuTlDpAGUeqxGmH8loVXCJoth1jM45 DaEMCop7HLksciPsC2AbAuoXfasGiXkSTtHFWJa/ZChJTUjwxyM9KiTeRLy7KJFW KBGFMDAwB816Dus2DkmJgPSg/7BfaqR44DwLxq7r6bhnweW/T7voDiz0587K8=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a89.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08BF89D735; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:53:43 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a89
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Cc: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, i18ndir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200610225341.GH3100@localhost>
References: <B7D61128A7109785BD555955@jkacere15> <C6967F02-35D9-484B-9BF8-7436D1DF3B65@viagenie.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C6967F02-35D9-484B-9BF8-7436D1DF3B65@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudehjedgudehucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefftdektefhueetveeigfefgeejteejvdfhhefgvddtfeeujeehleeguefhgffhgfenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhm
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i18ndir/WADRm5sgpqcj64iJTDUlFsamef4>
Subject: Re: [I18ndir] HTML, email addresses, etc
X-BeenThere: i18ndir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internationalization Directorate <i18ndir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i18ndir/>
List-Post: <mailto:i18ndir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i18ndir>, <mailto:i18ndir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:53:56 -0000

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 07:51:43AM -0400, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> On 7 Jun 2020, at 23:46, John C Klensin wrote:
> > (2) We could actually modify those specs to prohibit, or
> > strongly recommend against, allocating email addresses whose
> > local-parts contain anything but Unicode code points associated
> > with graphics, or even letters, digits, and a small selection of
> > symbols (possibly bringing the local-part recommendations close
> > to a PRECIS profile).
> 
> this is what I was going to say. IMHO, any protocol identifier (such as EAI)
> using something more than ASCII must define a PRECIS profile. This is the
> only chance to get it working. plain UTF8 for an identifier is just plain
> wrong.

I'm inclined to be as permissive as possible.

Ever play video games or used social media?  Have you noticed that many
people have usernames with -gasp- whitespace in them?  SASL wanted to
prohibit that -- a recipe for those applications not using SASL[*], a
recipe for failure.

Let's be permissive.  I'm OK with disallowing non-ASCII punctuation,
quotation marks, and misc things like non-breaking spaces (which should
be squeezed out) and so on, but I don't think we should try too hard to
make lists of banned characters.

Nico

[*] Well, OK, they don't and weren't going to use SASL, most likely.
    But the point stands.  These are policies that should be
    site-specific, not Internet-wide.