Re: [I2nsf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: (with COMMENT)
Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 25 September 2020 15:28 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5E63A0EFB; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CKOrqHQCIGVq; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD90A3A0EC5; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.25.185.139;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Murray Kucherawy' <superuser@gmail.com>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model@ietf.org, i2nsf-chairs@ietf.org, i2nsf@ietf.org, 'Linda Dunbar' <dunbar.ll@gmail.com>
References: <160093580547.23751.11467318753072993306@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160093580547.23751.11467318753072993306@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:08:39 -0400
Message-ID: <002101d6934d$c6a70dd0$53f52970$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQMcSSgyeT8PU/Qr9ILyshmvwnFt/6buBBCQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200925-0, 09/25/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/ZycMG8QD2Hv2dfqas0UOaAWI4Ew>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:28:47 -0000
Murray: Did our discussion regarding the history of the information model help resolve your concerns as well? Or do you have additional concerns that were not resolved? I believe that Benoit might have stated the Information model did the appropriate job by helping us form the data model. Thank you for raising this concerns. Sue -----Original Message----- From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 4:23 AM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model@ietf.org; i2nsf-chairs@ietf.org; i2nsf@ietf.org; Linda Dunbar Subject: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: (with COMMENT) Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Eric's DISCUSS position about the information model vs. data model publications. The smashed-together list of references at the top of Section 5 could use some formatting. I tripped over several of the editorial points Barry found. Here's one more. In Section 3: o If a network administrator wants to block malicious users for IPv6 traffic, he sends a security policy rule to block the users to the Network Operator Management System using the I2NSF User (i.e., web application). Block malicious users "for" IPv6 traffic? I don't understand. Perhaps "block IPv6 traffic from malicious users"?
- [I2nsf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
- Re: [I2nsf] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares