Re: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-04

박정수 <pjs@etri.re.kr> Tue, 30 January 2018 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <pjs@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5B5131A39 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:26:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ia_ZdyXTSDV for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:26:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mscreen.etri.re.kr (mscreen.etri.re.kr [129.254.9.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD31613179F for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown (HELO smtpeg.etri.re.kr) (129.254.27.141) by 129.254.9.16 with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2018 20:21:36 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 129.254.27.141
X-Original-MAILFROM: pjs@etri.re.kr
X-Original-RCPTTO: i2nsf@ietf.org, linda.dunbar@huawei.com
Received: from SMTP2.etri.info (129.254.28.72) by SMTPEG1.etri.info (129.254.27.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:21:34 +0900
Received: from SMTP4.etri.info ([169.254.3.153]) by SMTP2.etri.info ([10.2.6.31]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:21:35 +0900
From: 박정수 <pjs@etri.re.kr>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-04
Thread-Index: AdOW/ItNXWRltlCQTlmUMdCnL5ZA6QCoPvsg
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:21:35 +0000
Message-ID: <DF1316824A754B4A98FEF79DD3FC44EC0178ED29F2@SMTP4.etri.info>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B002215@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B002215@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: ko-KR, en-US
Content-Language: ko-KR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.217.8.84]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DF1316824A754B4A98FEF79DD3FC44EC0178ED29F2SMTP4etriinfo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/hmGZACeGkyWd-nEXooF4WAZfQkY>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-04
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:26:27 -0000

Dear chairs and members,

I think this work is a good collaboration with vendors.
I support the WG adoption of this draft.

Best Regards,
JungSoo

From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 8:24 AM
To: i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-04



The authors of I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-04

Have requested working group adoption of this draft.

Please bear in mind that WG Adoption doesn’t mean that the draft current content is ready, WG Adoption only means that it is a good basis for a working group to work on.

While all feedback is helpful, comments pro or con with explanations are much more helpful than just "yes please" or "no thank you".

Thank you.

Linda & Yoav