IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-04

elopez.ietf@nym.hush.com Tue, 06 February 2018 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <elopez.ietf@nym.hush.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0A91270A3 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:47:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hushmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sh0FwpV2HinU for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (smtp2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8853812702E for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 08:47:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CA08A0B1E for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:47:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-hush-tls-connected: 1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hushmail.com; h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; bh=ByLxTdIr6FxJN/m+/sMLBhIXXhs975n6CJ+U7Js8yxg=; b=FF596wW7/hHkuwADEDpltsDjhgoDXYibWt3jn7KoIJxZ91nCFmaseHJIkDeiokSWjectkaDbx8vahSRqLfpkXJcsVUqLp35Wpxk7D6MGoT8gw9vAl+aUl1KDUAan6yMqIdaN+zhJSk2Dh5cAbYmvDH6konTHDDqRnRqXyEUBXmyl8QT+yzeMvzO67Kdgmvgdk7IV1B4MZuwW8xuSGbLOFzDQoCIS4VjztRjTpdyoKYCN5pCkejWdvJyGnaIIVPtArhhf9+V7pumD8Q5VR+7ARrVCgSx21Y1cN+e83VOpWjPxfnmPlZC/5LLM216/6Gdqz5/BMejRkx8KKWcaSM/J9g==
Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:47:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 74D6BA0161; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 16:47:35 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:47:34 -0500
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, i2nsf@ietf.org
From: elopez.ietf@nym.hush.com
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B002215@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_608545fa6cea6bcffa1ac5bd0a828b3a"
Message-Id: <20180206164735.74D6BA0161@smtp.hushmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/jCmOojC4mB2Uu9dd0EdyhIsAa-A>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-04
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 16:47:38 -0000

Yes, I support this draft, and thank the authors for their effort!
Cheers!
Ed Lopez

On 1/26/2018 at 6:23 PM, "Linda Dunbar"  wrote:      
	The authors of I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model 

	https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-04

	Have requested working group adoption of this draft.   
	Please bear in mind that WG Adoption doesn’t mean that the draft
current content is ready, WG Adoption only means that it is a good
basis for a working group to work on. 
	While all feedback is helpful, comments pro or con with explanations
are much more helpful than just "yes please" or "no thank you". 
	Thank you.  
	Linda & Yoav

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email