Re: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-04

 Hi John,
Thanks for your constructive suggestions on our draft. :-)
We authors will clarify your suggestions on the next revision.

You can give us your advice on our next revision.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:46 AM, John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com> wrote:

> IMHO, the purpose of a WG adopting a draft is to acknowledge that the
> draft is a good starting point for the work that WG wants to accomplish. To
> be perfectly clear, I am NOT objecting on the completeness of the document.
> Rather, I am objecting on the technical correctness of the starting point.
>
> I do NOT feel that the proposed documents represent a good starting point.
> Ignoring things that can be easily fixed (e.g., grammar), there are a host
> of problems, such as:
>    - what, exactly, is this draft trying to do? I thought I would see YANG
> for policy rules sent over the Consumer-Facing Interface.
>      Instead, I see the name of the interface, whose first element is
> multi-tenancy, that also contains policies? Policies do not care
>      about multi-tenancy. They do care about domains. The organization of
> the YANG is incorrect.
>    - sec 4: in the ieft-i2nsf-cf-interface module
>       - why is multi-tenancy at the top of the tree? Shouldn't a DOMAIN
> be able to have multiple tenants?
>       - why does a domain have an authentication-method? First, multiple
> such methods should be able to be used. Second, how would a domain know
> what an authentication method even is?
>       - why is tenant a sibling of domain, and not a child?
>       - why is domain a leaf within policy-tenant? This should be a
> reference, and why doesn't domain have a reference to policy-tenant?
>       - policy roles have nothing to do with multi-tenancy - why are they
> here?
>
>  I could go on, but even the above means that the rest of the YANG will be
> wrong.
>
> Therefore, the document is NOT a good starting point, and will NOT
> accelerate the path to getting a good RFC.
>
> regards,
> John
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The authors of I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facin
>> g-interface-dm-04
>>
>>
>>
>> Have requested working group adoption of this draft.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please bear in mind that WG Adoption doesn’t mean that the draft current
>> content is ready, WG Adoption only means that it is a good basis for a
>> working group to work on.
>>
>>
>>
>> While all feedback is helpful, comments pro or con with explanations are
>> much more helpful than just "yes please" or "no thank you".
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>> Linda & Yoav
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> I2nsf mailing list
>> I2nsf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> regards,
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>
>

-- 
===========================
Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Software
Sungkyunkwan University
Office: +82-31-299-4957
Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.com, pauljeong@skku.edu
Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php
<http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>