Re: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Fri, 23 September 2016 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A94F12B9FF for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.836
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.836 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tyFiIlbG80m4 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C10D12B87A for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10443; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1474645051; x=1475854651; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ogpAfal9JcXXQnBBIoESTbUIz1hPYM1GwbrBDXuxYqY=; b=dB/odA/JWoMVIrYujQHgRKKqgXnzSDHuvkLjETToxfxTOs7978Vvh9EO /SDF1f1vnSef44hgjdj9Mp88LaUJqxBe0gOfJ9vyNhL7QEs3NHiTZ362m Z1rOYUu/h5uLdl5FJAv0Bze+OI7QOAys11qJUyCSi8oTephtr4sF5ghAN E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B0AQC5S+VX/5JdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgwc0AQEBAQEeV3wHjSyfAYc3hRCCBCSFegKBXTgUAQIBAQEBAQEBXieEYQEBAQQtTBACAQgOAwQBASQEByERFAkIAQEEAQ0FCIgpAxcOuR8Ng0IBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXBYY3hFSCR4FPEQFShSgFlB6FIzUBhiaGSYJxj3KIXIQPg3sBHjaDGRwYgThyhFiBIH8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,382,1470700800"; d="scan'208,217";a="152292591"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Sep 2016 15:37:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com (xch-rtp-010.cisco.com [64.101.220.150]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8NFbCuq008028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:37:13 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:37:12 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:37:11 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "i2rs@ietf.org" <i2rs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (
Thread-Index: AdITSCbrtSHgUQMgRaWQOQMKPW0cEACaCYFA
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:37:11 +0000
Message-ID: <b31dd1f31ef941ea980a8a037af6cce4@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <20c001d21348$831721b0$89456510$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <20c001d21348$831721b0$89456510$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.229]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_b31dd1f31ef941ea980a8a037af6cce4XCHRTP013ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/-UT0EVjQsoZhPC9EJ55C5QT9vlo>
Cc: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, 'Russ White' <russ@riw.us>, 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:37:33 -0000

Drafts look good.

From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:09 AM
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: Benoit Claise (bclaise) <bclaise@cisco.com>; 'Russ White' <russ@riw.us>; 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (

This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-04.txt (9/20 to 10/4) and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt from 9/20 to 10/3.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/>
In considering this draft, the I2RS WG should consider:

1)     Does the implementations of this draft in ODL open source code base sufficient experience on the Yang drafts?

2)     Does anyone know of other implementations of this model?

3)      Do you believe this Yang model is stable enough to publish and distribute to yang libraries?
 We did a WG LC in August, but we suspect this got caught in the August vacation email.
Sue Hares and Russ White
Co-chairs