Re: [i2rs] Call for WG Adoption: draft-keyupdate-irs-bgp-usecases-02

[Jon Mitchell <[e-mail]>]

On 29/07/13 09:02 -0400, Jon Mitchell wrote:
> multiple use case drafts but likely only one BGP use case draft in the
> WG.  undertsood that the WG can direct the authors to include the
> white use cases once WG adopted but I personally would like to know
> their receptiveness to the use cases in the white draft, and it
> appears others have posed the same question previously.

Based on my discussion with Keyur in person - I'm satisfied he will
work with the the other authors to integrate WG relevant use cases
from draft-white-i2rs-use-case-00 draft into the document if adopted,
so I now support it's adoption.  Here is my view on the differences
between the drafts:

I'd like to see Sections 3,5,6 from the white draft integrated.
Section 3 overlaps some with content in keyupdate but does not specify
using FlowSpec routes for DDoS diversion; presumably you could divert
traffic directly through i2rs messaging (if such a thing will exist).
Sections 2/7 are basically covered by the keyupdate doc, although
certainly useful text could be merged.  Use case in section 4 is not
on my list, maybe others feel strongly for it. 

Thanks,

-Jon