Re: [i2rs] Call for WG Adoption: draft-keyupdate-irs-bgp-usecases-02

[Jon Mitchell <[e-mail]>]

On 28/07/13 20:15 -0400, Russ White wrote:
> 
> > Please review draft-keyupdate-irs-bgp-usecases-02 and comment on
> > whether it should be adopted by I2RS.  Detailed technical conversation is
> also
> > most welcome.
> 
> I was under the impression that this was being merged with
> draft-white-i2rs-use-case... Did we decide to carry all these use cases
> forward separately? Or not to carry draft-white-i2rs-use-case forward?

WG Chairs - is the intent to only have one BGP use cases draft?

The current keyupdate draft has a large number of use cases and
scenarios, mostly focused on SP network requirements.  Also, I note
that most of it's use cases are centralized deployment and vendor
neutral specification of configuration oriented in nature.  If we are
going to only progress one document to cover BGP use cases, I would
prefer it cover at least some use cases oriented towards manipulation
of routing information to meet service differentiated routing such as
those specified in your draft.

At this time without knowing the authors intent (although one of the
authors is on both documents?) and lack of comment on Joel's similar
feedback earlier to the group, I'm can't support adoption of this
draft if there is only an intent to progress one.  I'd be willing to
support it if the authors are committed to integrating the white draft
use cases (that don't already overlap such as VPN membership) into a
merged document however.

Jon