Re: [i2rs] Call for WG Adoption: draft-keyupdate-irs-bgp-usecases-02

[Jon Mitchell <[e-mail]>]

On 29/07/13 13:40 +0200, Thomas Nadeau wrote:
> 
> On Jul 29, 2013:1:27 PM, at 1:27 PM, Alia Atlas <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> > From the comments so far, it is clear that there is work to be done on this draft before adoption.  I am quite eager to see the set of reasonable use-cases get discussed and put in. 
> > 
> > A single draft of BGP use-cases would be good.  Once one is adopted, the WG can direct the editors to add cases - if and when there is consensus to do so.
> > 
> > I don't think that a single draft of all I2RS use-cases is at all practical.  
> 
> 	I agree. You also need to consider the fact that things will evolve over time, and as a result that could hold up the progress of the early use cases in the IETF process as other use cases are discovered and added.   As you also know, we could gut the entire document and start from scratch just using the draft as a shell that targets that charter item. The point is that the WG has such a charter item, and this document at a minimum, is a good start to satisfy that. As you mention, once its a WG draft, the WG is in control of its content and can alter it as needed.


Ed/Alia/Tom - thanks for clarifying that we will have potentially
multiple use case drafts but likely only one BGP use case draft in the
WG.  undertsood that the WG can direct the authors to include the
white use cases once WG adopted but I personally would like to know
their receptiveness to the use cases in the white draft, and it
appears others have posed the same question previously.

-Jon