IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [i2rs] Call for Adoption by WG: draft-atlas-i2rs-architecture-01 (ends Aug 12)

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Tue, 13 August 2013 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C9411E81A7 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sAOJoZgKs3vO for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22e.google.com (mail-oa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332B311E81B7 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l10so7292296oag.19 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mOlYRkiYFHM8o3CU5ftnWa0EHg3vwNCE9YAnMDXZJLc=; b=pK+jgkvqGxEitvAsWVmmw5vQJJC1/PR5jaI0L1rNMGffw+TmRf/whNxfOp3nRaMM7g hq2WbIgfEmES+3v7VwfQx5jHTfuosA4quEF3aTBhHVAyGZx0eJJJ+rapzu9OLhqwn4D4 TdlOn6VxVBj/vZkfSQXIHe111b3192HV/AkFeDWiUu9/zWFzlnsFZboI170azulQB60s 7a3HvUmriJnZ5O6jX+lt/VkcfHGfPv2FRBgIAdPfYqkfafM37U31qhcNjrMs8+aq2Op9 kcNL0jMEX9ZuIPAI3kj6ljViayVnRLwsEsVxFfnJ9F8/rmnSnBEUvIP56wnAHLP0ZUHT o7Iw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.80.8 with SMTP id n8mr5926755oex.33.1376424385112; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.221.98 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <95067C434CE250468B77282634C96ED322D69783@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <CAG4d1rdDqdajvUeF4WwJ1Jwn_=xqOMkXrkWwCHtsdsZn6WKzRA@mail.gmail.com> <51F8ED88.5050208@cisco.com> <95067C434CE250468B77282634C96ED322D69783@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:06:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rdOFfdTzG=3X-aNRf1sTJ5V0MFV3KTcgMYyhE8BYTX-Kg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0116067888f73004e3d9c678"
Cc: "i2rs@ietf.org" <i2rs@ietf.org>, "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Call for Adoption by WG: draft-atlas-i2rs-architecture-01 (ends Aug 12)
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i2rs>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:06:41 -0000

in-line as ever

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
cpignata@cisco.com> wrote:

>
> On Jul 31, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Section 2:
>
> read scope: ...
>
> write scope: ...
>
> JMC: Should there be an event or notification scope in addition to read
> and write?
>
>
> +1 to this point. I think that it should also include some words about
> pub/sub.
>

[Alia] I think about the read scope as including the event or notification
scope - at least unless and until we have to have the extra complexity of
terminology.  I don't see where or why read scope and notification scope
need to be separate concepts??


> Section 6.6 covers some of this though, so perhaps a forward reference.
>

[Alia] In the terminology section??  If we needed notification scope, ok -
but I don't see an argument for it to be separated...

Alia


> Thanks,
>
> -- Carlos.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email