Re: [i2rs] Follow-up on draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability

Joel:

Are proposing that Informational models are separate documents than data
models? 

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:38 PM
To: Joe Clarke; i2rs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Follow-up on draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability

I would like to see the draft adopted by the WG, without the YANG model.

Thank you,
Joel

On 7/23/14, 1:26 PM, Joe Clarke wrote:
> At the meeting yesterday, the chairs called out a few non-chartered 
> drafts that had progressed and should have a final decision made as to 
> their future.  One was our draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability.
>
> I would like to address the question the chairs raised on the draft 
> and ask the WG if this can be adopted.  The question was, should this 
> draft be standalone or part of the architecture doc.
>
> This draft originally began as comments to Alia on the arch draft.  
> Alia suggested that a draft outlining what should be logged for 
> purposes of traceability should be created independent of the arch.  
> Since then, the arch has had some traceability language added, but the 
> details spelled out in draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability take these 
> "breadcrumbs" and expand on them specific to what would be required 
> for those needing to do diagnostic operations, accounting, and 
> auditing.  On top of that, the architecture draft is very well-baked 
> right now, and would benefit from going through on its own.
>
> In that case, I feel that this draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability stands 
> very much on its own and compliments the arch draft.
>
> Some of the feedback we've had on our latest rev (-02) was regarding 
> the YANG model we added.  The comments have been that a YANG model 
> really isn't needed here.  In fact, some of the general parts of this 
> might fit in the new syslog model work happening in NETMOD.  We would 
> not be opposed to taking out this module, and retaining the English 
> text explaining the importance of logging in I2RS as well as what 
> should be logged.
>
> Therefore, we (the authors) would ask the WG for two things:
>
> 1. Closure on the YANG module question.
> 2. Adoption of draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability as a WG item
>
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
>

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs