Re: [i2rs] Follow-up on draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability

I would agree with this assessment -- support without the yang model. A more generic multiple model might be nice if we need the illustration... Yang should be in a separate draft.

 :-)

Russ

> On Jul 23, 2014, at 1:37 PM, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
> I would like to see the draft adopted by the WG, without the YANG model.
> 
> Thank you,
> Joel
> 
>> On 7/23/14, 1:26 PM, Joe Clarke wrote:
>> At the meeting yesterday, the chairs called out a few non-chartered
>> drafts that had progressed and should have a final decision made as to
>> their future.  One was our draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability.
>> 
>> I would like to address the question the chairs raised on the draft and
>> ask the WG if this can be adopted.  The question was, should this draft
>> be standalone or part of the architecture doc.
>> 
>> This draft originally began as comments to Alia on the arch draft.  Alia
>> suggested that a draft outlining what should be logged for purposes of
>> traceability should be created independent of the arch.  Since then, the
>> arch has had some traceability language added, but the details spelled
>> out in draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability take these "breadcrumbs" and
>> expand on them specific to what would be required for those needing to
>> do diagnostic operations, accounting, and auditing.  On top of that, the
>> architecture draft is very well-baked right now, and would benefit from
>> going through on its own.
>> 
>> In that case, I feel that this draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability stands
>> very much on its own and compliments the arch draft.
>> 
>> Some of the feedback we've had on our latest rev (-02) was regarding the
>> YANG model we added.  The comments have been that a YANG model really
>> isn't needed here.  In fact, some of the general parts of this might fit
>> in the new syslog model work happening in NETMOD.  We would not be
>> opposed to taking out this module, and retaining the English text
>> explaining the importance of logging in I2RS as well as what should be
>> logged.
>> 
>> Therefore, we (the authors) would ask the WG for two things:
>> 
>> 1. Closure on the YANG module question.
>> 2. Adoption of draft-clarke-i2rs-traceability as a WG item
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> i2rs mailing list
>> i2rs@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs