IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [i2rs] Ephemeral State Requirements discussion

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Tue, 31 May 2016 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CCE12D0C5 for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id olFW-P67N7iT for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF6212D640 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784249A0287 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1464725178; bh=VqoW3aOygj9taRrT2njdUPNym/qkEHEq0zn7AlZOSnI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=GyorBI1irkD50Hgbw1kFDc0GRGNxtjrQJFaRPZkVhaxDARtlI06fUeSrEzip0NGvu El6SwqG7y7qpmiD1LqF3U6ldsotnN3cVczBt9WAq7h211N2egKPOIRIXI3f6tuMXPk 2IWSlD4AfpVO9+/v3ZFq2uDuL3+9EeOPNJiUrR0U=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25DB59A0285 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: i2rs@ietf.org
References: <000601d1bad5$70523090$50f691b0$@ndzh.com> <20160531063840.GA21289@elstar.local> <026df5be-4a60-f340-60aa-d713a0e75c48@joelhalpern.com> <20160531184844.GB22928@elstar.local> <413ef504-49a8-2ba2-7fd4-582a41bd0ad0@joelhalpern.com> <20160531192729.GA23116@elstar.local>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <fe90ead1-8dab-7afd-6d7d-c3f68bcee630@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:06:15 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160531192729.GA23116@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/JePx9npr-fHq8odRd_3pbZYJKWI>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Ephemeral State Requirements discussion
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 20:06:20 -0000

Thanks.  That makes sense to me.
Yours,
Joel

On 5/31/16 3:27 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 03:07:03PM -0400, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>> Would a fair paraphrase of the point you are making here be
>> that the <ephemeral> data store could sit next to the <applied> data stored
>> rather than either below or combined with it?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
> /js
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email