IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 04 October 2016 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD791295EF for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 08:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYEW3f8V2ogS for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 08:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17111295C9 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 08:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.124.175.11;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Linda Dunbar' <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, i2rs@ietf.org
References: <20c001d21348$831721b0$89456510$@ndzh.com> <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF64A8D27B5@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657F49D8A@dfweml501-mbb>
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657F49D8A@dfweml501-mbb>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:45:15 -0400
Message-ID: <0e7301d21e56$4d9cd430$e8d67c90$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0E74_01D21E34.C68C6CB0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGd+gow88rPsNFqB1p29RyAoHO3IgIE7NTcAi+nwLqg3uiuoA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/uuXCuup9Hsyk30d_4ehIPsJH5i8>
Cc: 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com>, 'Russ White' <russ@riw.us>, 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 15:47:23 -0000

I2RS WG: 

 

The topology models have passed WG LC.  These drafts will be forwarded to
the IESG for publication this week. 

 

draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo

draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology 

 

Sue Hares and Russ White 

 

From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:09 AM
To: i2rs@ietf.org
Cc: 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com>; 'Russ White' <russ@riw.us>; 'Alia
Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended
and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (

 

This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-04.txt (9/20
to 10/4) and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt from 9/20 to 10/3.


https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/> 

In considering this draft, the I2RS WG should consider:

1)      Does the implementations of this draft in ODL open source code base
sufficient experience on the Yang drafts?

2)      Does anyone know of other implementations of this model?

3)       Do you believe this Yang model is stable enough to publish and
distribute to yang libraries?

 We did a WG LC in August, but we suspect this got caught in the August
vacation email.  

Sue Hares and Russ White

Co-chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email