Re: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 01 November 2016 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8031293DF for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 03:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5CTOixgAZsqt for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 03:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22EC712940D for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 03:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11865; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1477996268; x=1479205868; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=VpKISFZbtUyO7NUTRb8lDphGzBuSHA6iURDLj+Zp1gI=; b=UaWFch91wLyE9RG2ShMYKkyJbYyjZneL83crkuFt0FchnQXU7kpw/G1S dyRwvc37hvWVAMZM+H/37f2a9y57JczWm7iQNu7QQs+z8nDcMUK13WSTk XimvnoZN5x1DMxYlVuBZ7vnu9nILGv4OXTTOcT8TtWeC1AxbAmVJLdQTG 8=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,579,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="647788688"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Nov 2016 10:31:06 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA1AV6HX012332; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:31:06 GMT
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "'Linda Dunbar'" <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, i2rs@ietf.org
References: <20c001d21348$831721b0$89456510$@ndzh.com> <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF64A8D27B5@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F657F49D8A@dfweml501-mbb> <0e7301d21e56$4d9cd430$e8d67c90$@ndzh.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <8dafed93-fb4e-2985-095d-bb14177876e6@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 11:31:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0e7301d21e56$4d9cd430$e8d67c90$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------3367D8439198FEAC175E9135"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/vcT33uQBRUoSaVbIekwpS_g7iaY>
Cc: 'Russ White' <russ@riw.us>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:31:10 -0000

Dear all,

Can you please progress those two drafts, assuming that they're still ready.

Regards, Benoit
>
> I2RS WG:
>
> *The topology models have passed WG LC.  These drafts will be 
> forwarded to the IESG for publication this week. *
>
> draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo
>
> draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology
>
> Sue Hares and Russ White
>
> *From:* i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Susan Hares
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:09 AM
> *To:* i2rs@ietf.org <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
> *Cc:* 'Benoit Claise' <bclaise@cisco.com <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>>; 
> 'Russ White' <russ@riw.us <mailto:russ@riw.us>>; 'Alia Atlas' 
> <akatlas@gmail.com <mailto:akatlas@gmail.com>>
> *Subject:* [i2rs] WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-05.txt 
> extended and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt (
>
> This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-04.txt 
> (9/20 to 10/4) and draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-network-topo-06.txt from 
> 9/20 to 10/3.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/>
>
> In considering this draft, the I2RS WG should consider:
>
> 1)Does the implementations of this draft in ODL open source code base 
> sufficient experience on the Yang drafts?
>
> 2)Does anyone know of other implementations of this model?
>
> 3)Do you believe this Yang model is stable enough to publish and 
> distribute to yang libraries?
>
>  We did a WG LC in August, but we suspect this got caught in the 
> August vacation email.
>
> Sue Hares and Russ White
>
> Co-chairs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs