Re: [Ianaplan] response to a question posted by on the NRO list by Vint
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 19 May 2015 18:54 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F0E1ACDE7 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eD-qXd8q4L2u for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579DB1B29CB for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2015 11:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB312CF05; Tue, 19 May 2015 21:52:55 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VzrNZuUxUbUV; Tue, 19 May 2015 21:52:55 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6615B2CF04; Tue, 19 May 2015 21:52:55 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0C744DDA-1F6E-4ECA-A344-CEFB5F4339AA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150518215358.7AB052CEC5@p130.piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 21:52:54 +0300
Message-Id: <602B7E50-8034-47DE-851A-993655488789@piuha.net>
References: <5EC90FAF-772C-4454-9526-0FAB863BA9D0@piuha.net> <20150518215358.7AB052CEC5@p130.piuha.net>
To: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/aoNe_Olm5LOouaIPR0zVVyNUir4>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] response to a question posted by on the NRO list by Vint
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 18:54:01 -0000
JFC, > I think I need some clarification. You say that the IETF maintains backup copies. Then you say we are committed providing these services. Does "these services" mean back-up of the IANA and RFC-Editor sites (as anyone could as well do), or does our commitment means that we can proactively provide the IANA and RFC Editor data the community needs? I meant the entire service, not just the backup. Jari