Re: [Ianaplan] response to a question posted by on the NRO list by Vint
JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com> Mon, 18 May 2015 21:53 UTC
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B811ACD5E for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 14:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.134
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bHEqGDNf9nF4 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2015 14:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host.presenceweb.org (host.presenceweb.org [67.222.106.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BF441ACD5B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2015 14:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 251.47.14.81.rev.sfr.net ([81.14.47.251]:52330 helo=GHM-SAM.dot.dj) by host.presenceweb.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1YuSyn-0000is-KI; Mon, 18 May 2015 14:53:48 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 23:52:08 +0200
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <5EC90FAF-772C-4454-9526-0FAB863BA9D0@piuha.net>
References: <5EC90FAF-772C-4454-9526-0FAB863BA9D0@piuha.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.presenceweb.org
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.presenceweb.org: authenticated_id: intl+dot.dj/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Message-Id: <20150518215349.6BF441ACD5B@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/zC_RxCBwANNyrvQipOIzu8Y93TQ>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] response to a question posted by on the NRO list by Vint
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 21:53:50 -0000
At 22:26 18/05/2015, Jari Arkko wrote: > > As a general policy, the IETF maintains backup copies of data > associated with the services that we employ. Examples of this > include the IANA registry and RFC Editor services. A standard > business practice on our part. But the important thing is that we > are committed providing these services to the IETF and implementor > communities, per community needs, under all circumstances now and > in the future. Dear Jari, I think I need some clarification. You say that the IETF maintains backup copies. Then you say we are committed providing these services. Does "these services" mean back-up of the IANA and RFC-Editor sites (as anyone could as well do), or does our commitment means that we can proactively provide the IANA and RFC Editor data the community needs? Thank you. jfc