IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ice] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ice-pac-04: (with COMMENT)

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 21 April 2020 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ice@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D5B3A085C; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=V7hOnsZ9; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Ca/JMRBe
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NERs-pIoFg8f; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B953A085A; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3536; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1587497054; x=1588706654; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=R6IYIrsNF0TD4pAnFFw6DIvyQL5K9VyEzxYwzWO5fYo=; b=V7hOnsZ9phPBkCF2xRJDCgcAKkY/q88bfyD4s09oLdjYE48rhPMK6giI 1f1/u2NKhV1oYWSMaIH7ijT1IoqBppYcNl5Z9fqRJjV17r9ZyNsstTzLJ 99KaymzcSfQZui3PrZ8btmB0OzjRzLssGrkfVauMI/kYCwuDjHMPZn85G k=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:N9SX8hLo3Ycq3ttrSNmcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4ZM7irVIN76u5InmIFeBvad2lFGcW4Ld5roEkOfQv636EU04qZea+DFnEtRXUgMdz8AfngguGsmAXEDlPfjhbCESF8VZX1gj9Ha+YgBY
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DjAQDzRp9e/4sNJK1gBhsBAQEBAQEBBQEBAREBAQMDAQEBgXuBVFEFgUQgBAsqhB6DRgOKa4I6JZgoglIDVAoBAQEMAQEtAgQBAYREAheCACQ4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FVgyFcQEBAQECARIREQwBATcBCwQCAQgRAwECAwImAgICMBUFAwgCBAENBSKDBIJMAw4gAaVsAoE5iGJ1gTKDAAEBBYVEGIIOCYEOKoJjgkKHFBqBQT+BEScMEIJNPoQ+gyIygi2OKoMDoF8KgkSXch2CVohRhHKMRINnjAyBVZsaAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFWcBVlAYI+UBgNkVgMF4NQilZ0gSmOJgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,411,1580774400"; d="scan'208";a="466863598"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 Apr 2020 19:24:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03LJOBOv018884 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:24:11 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:24:11 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:24:10 -0400
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:24:09 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=CFRxTj7MzEsTIrhhrubDo4mnBnfXE5TLA6oetUSfJ+7NNeMr8a3QH/ebVv+74LxgGmhlPo3edv61QTy6Ch0qLsOc18JA9Ty3L6GYIlaxjQmOX+zkq349mc5EaEkJ1xvVfx3eAKe14bJPsHQbFjCgQnyVNeVKr29lgNQJ95Qy88j8ziIFtZT2PstGB/GIYDRpNtYNv3/wS0XbSw41FtjWFpffWikvsYfBeEAbT5MilvxMnAHLQARkKfpA6fhFnEp6Yy0SdtBE8oAYeNZYkIMHxDBxlBARz7d9FlIvF0rsVHWDwq+PdQzXFLpcFW6lM1PMsdnKTiZbfHrtIjLJWoJ5Ug==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=R6IYIrsNF0TD4pAnFFw6DIvyQL5K9VyEzxYwzWO5fYo=; b=W+IubZ3uwU5BGMhktQRThZZFz5kTU33NOAOWcN75psay0LUnSqeWZU7aLjtXz/qyLrS/c/aB9G7PkNL8IIbWYljMgatMn75M+LXR8+YWFnEJVho/i/77x1gQ56MP8mr1gV8K8sbzh6iN3pJ2sw2KmlvRzpKrGvQdtY5AHwmXFYBJ25wfHuGFxXr4zDz0/C00Dgq0Sv8VrvnMYvVhWhBDpTCtxJAJ5grK16SWXpV45jhuHYdnsRpiSDFMrItaendpjCgxiiCPLp4DypYi24sX8Slczfbf5b4Gl691G5hwJ9RjUut6uY5xYP7o5srwN6diNddKnQwX85KPJtSybAJALA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=R6IYIrsNF0TD4pAnFFw6DIvyQL5K9VyEzxYwzWO5fYo=; b=Ca/JMRBeRcsLxg0T54ILYnJf1gE4gCMjSz5hFiM0h8shI/zVnV2tXOGlRn+vh104eDUgBxsnF1FS7c/oM3eZxceAKHcait0VANaPuO+YghFW+qXCDNCXs/abV+0giO6oohkz6nktjO0qCGtTV3Ki641Zi7k9A4PbgKXGis2Ln9k=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::13) by DM5PR11MB1659.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:6::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.29; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:24:09 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7458:f0d0:22b2:6b0c]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7458:f0d0:22b2:6b0c%9]) with mapi id 15.20.2921.027; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:24:09 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ice-pac@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ice-pac@ietf.org>, "ice-chairs@ietf.org" <ice-chairs@ietf.org>, "ice@ietf.org" <ice@ietf.org>, Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
Thread-Topic: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ice-pac-04: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWF+laI4/pE3h93EGf6P2uFHYjPqiD9msAgAAgJAA=
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:24:09 +0000
Message-ID: <1387C0B3-1693-4A8D-83A0-0F93B99A407C@cisco.com>
References: <158747937967.30818.11917169559141666632@ietfa.amsl.com> <79EF9BAD-FA0C-4019-AF2C-A3A8FFC988A4@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <79EF9BAD-FA0C-4019-AF2C-A3A8FFC988A4@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.36.20041300
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:b9d9:3465:e20b:cd40]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2dc0136a-4ad0-4b56-4610-08d7e62990c6
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1659:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB165978FD283C90C61A13D5E2A9D50@DM5PR11MB1659.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 038002787A
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(478600001)(2616005)(33656002)(2906002)(66574012)(54906003)(71200400001)(224303003)(316002)(66946007)(6512007)(76116006)(110136005)(8936002)(81156014)(66556008)(4326008)(86362001)(66476007)(5660300002)(91956017)(64756008)(6506007)(66446008)(36756003)(6486002)(186003)(53546011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: XSGVRPaOZMxM/dZr5Y0/IKmk+6DXvhF87t7ikOlvoMyau1QSWmSbVCVUYyOTSJJnld6CHzF9qrr0tKKd2Wu5131BLI1aAFm/TtVkkUu7IctFnU720fwBk0YMPBxkuCa2uGx8nGMjqS9DwpAOKnUjVZLYx9NyExpRrWIrioJbgBSficq9OaKl1UCn1hcsSuHC3jLOuSEwD01CgUFZ1z3auZ/ejQAidLWOBnh6v1iX6wcLi/W8O0IJlVF6F5wBsxSGOEqAZMfCxQnqeKcZdGxPXABXzdTAAts50SRKPVtCyPeV5oiIAX49gi8WoLw7/VfkyzaHpxpGXQozY8WpBOnNovRXSQHjmyWJCI/M6Wisa3+UaVal/SwrnKRH4sVfM867lLigxh1VH9zwtn7aimN3RFJyx9PhDszpdnl41iAmB/VFC5x8Dog/YtZy1yBVHGa4
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: O3rn5ZBm+mfPb0q+4F9SfrLDuisbrWpQXM+x7IykNuyX3J8055dtMG8J4I74tSQgcGXMYH++VnOSBqAr6iwVQc8k0L1almdqJMfcg9NaYMgwEIyQS3RuK/sYfs8hDJzw7W3l79lqqb3q5IWlnX92wP55W8oplTVCXtz7GwrkkRK7l5Jo+dgawUHBuFX4Z1z514BAIhDWTYirhWSFaEuiaw==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A8453385363464499814B98898E76C7F@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2dc0136a-4ad0-4b56-4610-08d7e62990c6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Apr 2020 19:24:09.2575 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ip971SlpMaAJJbG2jn+9q/CYHaXM35pA5j/pfWNXOMiJDHh9a9wD8l+SQYTMyWadkWRbyssL+J9zuLr7Z/BHdw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1659
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ice/kEorEDdt8BMwjhBwNM70s6M49Ak>
Subject: Re: [Ice] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ice-pac-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ice@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interactive Connectivity Establishment \(ICE\)" <ice.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ice/>
List-Post: <mailto:ice@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ice>, <mailto:ice-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:24:18 -0000

Hello Christer,

Thank you for the explanation about the update of a document still "blocked" in the RFC editor queue. Up to you and your responsible AD.

Even after Barry's kind explanations about "race conditions" (in French "conditions de course" :-) ...), I feel that this does not apply to this document (cfr use case in section 3.1) but I really do not mind. Just wanted to raise a flag.

Regards and thank you for your document

-éric

-----Original Message-----
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Date: Tuesday, 21 April 2020 at 18:29
To: Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ice-pac@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ice-pac@ietf.org>, "ice-chairs@ietf.org" <ice-chairs@ietf.org>, "ice@ietf.org" <ice@ietf.org>, Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
Subject: Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ice-pac-04: (with COMMENT)

    Hi Éric,

    Thank You for the review! Please see inline.

        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
        COMMENT:
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------

        > Thank you for this short and easy to read document.
        >
        > But, I cannot refrain from wondering about this part as the trickle-ice I-D is
        > still in RFC editor queue => easier to fix it in the body of the trickle-ice
        > IMHO (could be wrong): "[RFC EDITOR NOTE: Please replace RFC XXXX with the RFC
        > number of draft-ietf-ice-trickle once it has been published.  Please also
        >   indicate that this specification updates RFC XXXX.]"

    Originally we assumed that trickle-ice was going to be published before ice-pac. The reason trickle-ice has been on hold in the RFC editor queue is because it is part of the Cluster 238 collection of drafts, which all are intended to be published at the same time.

    Having said that, we think it is more clear to fix both RFC 8445 and trickle-ice in the same place (this draft). Much of the content is describing the problems, and making the trickle update in trickle-ice would mean that we would have to copy/paste most of the text there.

        > I also wonder why section 1 talks about 'race conditions' while the issue is
        > related to a too short default time-out or in the use cases of section 3. (in
        > my mind, 'race conditions' is an unusual sequence of events).

    English is not my native language, so I hope Justin can comment on this.

    Regards,

    Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email